uh oh....BLARGE!!!!

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

You stated above that a RULE can't be defended by rule. Do you know how truly idiotic in nature that statement really is?

I do not presume to speak for Mark, but for those who may not know, he is merely pointing out the conflict between rule 4-7 and case 4.19.8C. This conflict, I believe, has been recognized by many, including some who say varying degrees of "That's what you have to do because that's what the case play says," which tells me that they agree that no reasonable person could have read the rule book and come up with this case play.