Rule 4-22 (Goaltending)

[bainsey]

Originally Posted by just another ref

When the rule is this plainly stated, why would you need a case?

Again, to defy the myth that the offense can only commit basket interference, and not goaltending.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by bainsey

Defy the myth that the offense can only commit basket interference, and not goaltending.

Paul Bunyan was a myth. Offensive goaltending, and offensive basket interference, are the real deal.

[bainsey]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

Paul Bunyon [sic] was a myth.

Says you, Connecticut!

Paul Bunyan is a good friend that lives happily near the legendary home for high school tournament basketball, the Bangor Auditorium.

(It's the airplane-looking thing in the background. 26, back me up...)

[Adam]

Originally Posted by bainsey

Again, to defy the myth that the offense can only commit basket interference, and not goaltending.

The rule itself will have to suffice.

[Camron Rust]

From a fairness point, why would a rule permit the offense to grab/touch a ball yet prohibit the defense from doing so when the ball is in play (time periods during FTs and throwins excepted since they're part of the penalty for another infraction or otherwise earned).

[deecee]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

From a fairness point, why would a rule permit the offense to grab/touch a ball yet prohibit the defense from doing so when the ball is in play (time periods during FTs and throwins excepted since they're part of the penalty for another infraction or otherwise earned).

alley oop pass.

[BktBallRef]

Originally Posted by bainsey

Again, to defy the myth that the offense can only commit basket interference, and not goaltending.

Never heard of such a myth until you created it in this thread.