Jurassic Referee |
Fri Jan 07, 2011 05:05pm |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust
(Post 713151)
If it better describes the desired way in which the calls should be made, then it is not "Same old, same old". And in my opinion, it describes a much more clear set of criteria to determine if a foul has been committed than the very generic A/D. A/D is open to a much wider range of interpretation than RSBQ. RSBQ actually defines what constitutes A/D.
|
Trainers have been using the exact same criteria as RSBQ for umpteen years while trying to explain advantage/disadvantage.I was one of them.
Same concept, different words.
|