No foul on thrower-in at end of game?

[Adam]

Originally Posted by DesMoines

Had this play earlier this year. Less than 5 seconds, clock running, so B1 just steps across end line and wraps up thrower.
Tweet. T.
B1 looks at me, shrugs, and says, "What else was I supposed to do?"

Why the T and not the intentional? Did you go team T or player T?

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Why the T and not the intentional? Did you go team T or player T?

Right:
contacting thrower = INT
contacting ball = T

[Adam]

Originally Posted by mbyron

Right:
contacting thrower = INT
contacting ball = T

Yep, and crossing the line is simply a Team T (not assessed to the player).

[DesMoines]

I went Team T. They'd already had a DOG warning and Team T for knocking the ball away after a score so they could set up for their press. Upon reflection, I suppose I could (and maybe should) have gone INT, but thought that since the action was a delay, that's where I went.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by DesMoines

I went Team T. They'd already had a DOG warning and Team T for knocking the ball away after a score so they could set up for their press. Upon reflection, I suppose I could (and maybe should) have gone INT, but thought that since the action was a delay, that's where I went.

Fair enough, I was wondering. I can make a lot of similar "upon reflection" statements.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by DesMoines

I went Team T. They'd already had a DOG warning and Team T for knocking the ball away after a score so they could set up for their press. Upon reflection, I suppose I could (and maybe should) have gone INT, but thought that since the action was a delay, that's where I went.

I understand your way of thinking about this, but you didn't make the correct ruling. You'll nail it next time.

[DesMoines]

Yep. We talked about it in our postgame. No one even questioned it at the time, but I knew I hadn't gotten it quite right. We should have recorded the INT on the B1, had A1 shoot two empty (rather than any player), then gone back to the end line.
Next question, can he move on the inbound? No, right?

[Adam]

Originally Posted by DesMoines

Yep. We talked about it in our postgame. No one even questioned it at the time, but I knew I hadn't gotten it quite right. We should have recorded the INT on the B1, had A1 shoot two empty (rather than any player), then gone back to the end line.
Next question, can he move on the inbound? No, right?

Spot throw-in. 7.5.7D

Rule 7-5-7b says "common foul."

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by DesMoines

Next question, can he move on the inbound? No, right?

Correct in FED; the inbounder can run the end-line in NCAA, I think.