NFHS Interpt. - The Official Forum

PAULK1 The new interputations are... Tue Oct 15, 2002, 04:21pm

AK ref SE Thanks for the site...it... Tue Oct 15, 2002, 04:40pm

Brian Watson I found situation 4... Tue Oct 15, 2002, 11:40pm

Jurassic Referee An indirect T is charged to... Wed Oct 16, 2002, 04:20am

Jake80 Situation #14 A1 gains... Wed Oct 16, 2002, 12:52pm

Mark Dexter Not exactly. The situation... Wed Oct 16, 2002, 04:48pm

Jurassic Referee Uh,what's the... Wed Oct 16, 2002, 05:06pm

bob jenkins If a player hops and lands on... Wed Oct 16, 2002, 09:18pm

Camron Rust While I agree that it is... Thu Oct 17, 2002, 01:21pm

bob jenkins THere's some case... Thu Oct 17, 2002, 07:01pm

Jurassic Referee Case Book play 4.43.3SitB is... Thu Oct 17, 2002, 08:22pm

#1 (permalink)

Tue Oct 15, 2002, 11:40pm

Brian Watson Brian Watson is offline

Official Forum Member

Join Date: Jan 2000

Posts: 1,051

I found situation 4 interesting.

We have always used the following interp:

It is 1 indirect to the coach no matter how many players come off the bench. Although, each player off is charged with 1 flagrant T each. So, if three come off, they each get nailed with a Flagrant T, and 1 indirect is assessed to the coach.

This interp seems to indicate that an indirect is assessed for each player off the bench, or am I not reading it right?

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is On Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:24pm.