If I could change one rule, it would be....

[Adam]

Originally Posted by bainsey

I'd actually like to experiment with this rule: two/three shots OR the ball. I don't know if it will discourage late-game fouls, but it's worth trying.

I disagree. I like the rule as it is. In a game where the trailing team tries to foul to catch up, how many fouls do you typically see for this purpose? Two, three, four at most? Note, I'm not asking for the worst case scenario, just the typical situation. I don't think it's broken.

And if we (me included) would call the intentional when it's warranted, it would also reduce it.