6-4-3 casebook
 

2009, not sure if 10/11 is different #


SIMULTANEOUS VIOLATION
6.4.3 SITUATION A: B1, in a marked lane space, enters the lane prematurely.
The administering official properly signals the violation and A1 attempts the free
throw. However, A1’s attempt does not enter the basket or touch the ring.
RULING: The violations by B1 and A1 constitute a simultaneous free-throw violation.
Unless another free throw follows, play resumes with an alternating-possession throw-in from a designated spot outside the end line.

Happened last night in a small varsity girls tourney, two man. I was trail and shooter stepped on line during a 1 and 1 which I killed. Partner said he had a previous violation on B1 who entered top of key early, I never saw his signal as it happened simultaneously. He was adamant that his call took precedent. I knew he was wrong, but we moved on.

My question is I seem to remember if an opposing player disconcerts shooter, causing him/her to violate there is no double violation. I can't find it.

9.1.3 Situation G