Raymond |
Wed May 26, 2010 01:55pm |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
(Post 678625)
The difference between your two situations is exactly why the wording of 9-9-2 was changed for the 2008-09 season.
Prior to then your second play was not a violation by the strict text of the rule.
I happen to believe that it was due to a post which I wrote on this forum, but that may be an overly optimistic opinion.
|
I believe your posts are the genesis for most editorial changes. :p
|