![]() |
|
|||
I clicked the link, and got 404 not found.........not that unusual. And then you pop off about something you know nothing about, also not unusual.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
![]() Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
Just saying what, exactly? You say so much, so often, without actually saying anything, it's hard to keep it all straight.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
|
|||
Quote:
![]() Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
Maybe you could go hang out with those 9 year olds and improve your reading comprehension skills. I made no assertion. I was responding to the above description, a part of the OP, which was also quoted in my original post. ![]() Rut must be a high quality official. His resume speaks for itself. My question is how he manages to find his way home after the game?
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
|
|||
Quote:
![]() Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) Last edited by JRutledge; Mon Feb 22, 2010 at 02:22am. |
|
|||
Keep trying, little buddy. Go back to that thread. Go slowly. Sound each word out individually. Maybe you will realize that I made no such call.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
|
|||
Quote:
Now, back to the thread. This is what you said. I could see the link when you posted this. I even had to download the videos to watch them. I did this all after you posted this comment. Now what part is hard for you to read? The video was taken down after this. It probably was taken down because the person realized that they were not going to accomplish much by keeping them up. Oh well, but these are the things you get upset by. What else is new? Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
This is the point when Rut usually either goes off on another tangent, or totally disappears from the thread.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
|
|||
I am just not that into you.
Quote:
There is a difference between ignoring you and disappearing. You are not someone I particularly care to talk to, so I do not like answering your little juvenile questions as you like to ask. You do not have a sense of humor. You are not funny. You take this forum too seriously and I would rather not talk to you at all. Again, keep talking about T’ing people for giving a high five (Your thread, not mine ![]() Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
You have serious issues.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
If you truly think that was the parent's intent when making that post, then you are sadly mistaken. His intent was to have us substantiate his claims about biased, brutal officiating. Did you happen to notice the claim that the officiating wasn't "fair"? Iow those calls weren't being missed both ways? I could care less about the actual rules/calls involved or the quality of the officiating. You obviously have a rec league of some kind here, composed of 9 year-old girls and being officiated by high school students who most likely have received nada in the way of formal training. What bothers me is we have a parent of a 9 year-old girl sitting in the stands publically berating and verbally abusing those high school kids trying to officiate that game. That's the issue, not whether some damn illegal screen call got missed. If you think that there's anything at all "positive" about that behavior, so be it. You're entitled to your opinion. I disagree completely with you and I always will. That's my opinion and I'm entitled to that. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Region Picks | archer | Basketball | 12 | Thu Feb 23, 2006 11:40am |
Question about moving screens | 81artmonk | Basketball | 9 | Thu Jan 26, 2006 03:12pm |
Moving Screen Question | ATXCoach | Basketball | 2 | Wed Dec 14, 2005 12:32am |
Question about moving up to college.... | dsimp8 | Basketball | 5 | Thu Jan 27, 2005 12:08pm |
Moving picks? | bballplayer | Basketball | 11 | Thu Nov 11, 2004 02:46pm |