![]() |
I would like to add a point that might be implicit here: namely, that fighting is not the only reason for calling a flagrant foul. Clear intent to injure is also one, and deliberately aiming the ball at an opponent's head serves no other purpose, so...
I have no idea whether fighting receives special treatment in my state or whether the first-punch thrower gets it worse, or anything else about sanctions. That's all above my pay grade: I just call the foul and write the report. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Now the debate has been whether the action constitutes fighting or is simply a flagrant technical foul for unsporting conduct. Care to make a choice? ;) |
Quote:
The act being discussed doesn't meet the definition of fighting as outlined in rule 4-18. It does meet the definition of a flagrant technical foul under 4-19-5(b) & 4-19-4. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
1. Does this fit the rule, by word, for "fighting?" I think it does. It's a combative act between opponents. 2. Does it fit the spirit and intent of the committee? This is more difficult to determine, generally, but I fail to see how this doesn't fit the intent. |
Suggestion: Lump them together.
10-3-6: A player shall not commit an unsporting foul. This includes.......acts such as: i. fighting. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:36am. |