Quote:
I think that defines all free throw violations concerning the lines. |
He Said Sarcastically ...
Quote:
|
Semicircle ???
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
"What's it gonna be boy? I gotta know right now!!!" (Meatloaf)
Quote:
9-1-3-e: The free thrower shall not have either foot beyond the vertical plane of the edge of the free-throw line which is farther from the basket or the freethrow semicircle line. The free thrower shall not have either foot beyond the vertical plane of the edge the freethrow semicircle line. Which edge? I've always treated it like a boundary line, the "inner" edge being "out". Nevaderef, I believe, says to use the "outer" edge in regard to this rule. Which edge? And again, this is only for theoretical purposes. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
2) If you take out the part in red which refers to one situation, it leaves the other situation of the two detailed in 9-1-3e(as written right below that in blue). Note that in the red-highlighted situation, they say that the FT shooter can't step on the closest edge of the FT line to him/her. It stands to reason that they also meant that the same criteria should apply to the semicircle line as the free throw line-i.e. the FT shooter can't step on the closest edge of the semicircle line to him. And afaik, that's the way it has always been interpreted and called. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
And There Aren't Any Monkeys Flying Out Out Of My *** ...
Quote:
Quote:
http://thm-a02.yimg.com/nimage/6ee544805f7e9120 |
Quote:
|
9-1-3-e: The free thrower shall not have either foot beyond the vertical plane of the edge of the free-throw line which is farther from the basket or the freethrow semicircle line.
The key for me is the word "beyond." Standing ON the semicircle is not placing a foot beyond it. The rule clearly states that for the FT line the farther edge from the basket is the edge which a foot may not be beyond. JR and I disagree about which edge of the 2" wide FT semicircle restricts the thrower. I believe that it is the same edge which restricts the players not in marked lane spaces along the FT lane. So the thrower gets the arc, but the players outside of the 3pt area do not. The latter is point which JR mentions. Note what is the mathematical line of demarcation here. It is the outermost edge or the arc. There is no neutral zone between the FT shooter and the players outside of the 3pt area provided for in the rules. Also, if one consults the court diagram in the front of the rules book, one can see that the apex of the 3pt arc is exactly 25 feet from the end line and has a radius of six feet as measured from a point at the center of the FT line which is farther from the end line. The farther edge of FT line is 19 feet from the end line and 15 feet from the plane of the backboard. In order to give the FT shooter his full six feet of space one has to give him the arc. To not do so would be to only allow him five feet and ten inches of vertical depth. |
I think there are some courts where the entire semicircle is one color -- and it extends to the three point arc.
So, similar to the OOB "line" being one color all the way to the wall, I think the shooter can stand on the semi-circle line. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
And why would he possibly need it? And has anyone ever seen this violation? And if so, I bet a million dollars the shooter stepped over the line anyway, not just on it, so it really doesn't matter. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:10am. |