The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Throw-in spot (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/56134-throw-spot.html)

TimTaylor Tue Dec 29, 2009 01:01pm

"Almost" only counts in horse shoes, hand grenades & atomic bombs......:eek:

j51969 Tue Dec 29, 2009 01:19pm

What if the player were pregnant? T for six in the game, first. A1 is fouled on a try for a goal by pregnant player B1 and B1/2. Is this a multiple foul?

Back In The Saddle Tue Dec 29, 2009 02:59pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by j51969 (Post 646637)
What if the player were pregnant? T for six in the game, first. A1 is fouled on a try for a goal by pregnant player B1 and B1/2. Is this a multiple foul?

But who would shoot the free throws? :eek:

chseagle Tue Dec 29, 2009 03:24pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by j51969 (Post 646637)
What if the player were pregnant? T for six in the game, first. A1 is fouled on a try for a goal by pregnant player B1 and B1/2. Is this a multiple foul?

If the player was pregnant, they'd most likely be in their 1st trimester only, or they didn't know they were pregnant.

Concerning the married player, they would of been emancipated from their parents & were allowed to marry. Also the player could be 18 & just recently married.

Most, if not majority of the time, on an Endline throw-in the player just stands there.

Back In The Saddle Tue Dec 29, 2009 03:31pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by chseagle (Post 646663)
If the player was pregnant, they'd most likely be in their 1st trimester only, or they didn't know they were pregnant.

Concerning the married player, they would of been emancipated from their parents & were allowed to marry. Also the player could be 18 & just recently married.

Most, if not majority of the time, on an Endline throw-in the player just stands there.

You missed it entirely ;)

Mark Padgett Tue Dec 29, 2009 03:32pm

Don't forget, if the fetus was wearing number 1/2, that would be an illegal number and you'd have a technical.

j51969 Tue Dec 29, 2009 03:33pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by chseagle (Post 646663)
If the player was pregnant, they'd most likely be in their 1st trimester only, or they didn't know they were pregnant.

Concerning the married player, they would of been emancipated from their parents & were allowed to marry. Also the player could be 18 & just recently married.

Most, if not majority of the time, on an Endline throw-in the player just stands there.

Whiff..whiff..whiff 3 strikes and YOUR OUT!:D

Welpe Tue Dec 29, 2009 03:33pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by chseagle (Post 646663)
If the player was pregnant, they'd most likely be in their 1st trimester only, or they didn't know they were pregnant.

Yeah but that doesn't answer the question about who would shoot the free throws.

Quote:

Concerning the married player, they would of been emancipated from their parents & were allowed to marry. Also the player could be 18 & just recently married.
That's OK, they can run the endline too.

Adam Tue Dec 29, 2009 03:34pm

Why not?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by chseagle (Post 646663)
1. If the player was pregnant, they'd most likely be in their 1st trimester only, or they didn't know they were pregnant.

2. Concerning the married player, they would of been emancipated from their parents & were allowed to marry. Also the player could be 18 & just recently married.

3. Most, if not majority of the time, on an Endline throw-in the player just stands there.

1. Not necessarily, a woman in my office was going to the gym until a week before she gave birth. Regardless, it still doesn't answer j's question.

2. It's not the impossibility that troubles us, but the rarity.

3. I don't see that often. Normally the player is at least making movements that suggest he's ready to throw the ball. The good news is he's only allowed to stand there for 5 seconds.

j51969 Tue Dec 29, 2009 03:34pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett (Post 646669)
Don't forget, if the fetus was wearing number 1/2, that would be an illegal number and you'd have a technical.

I missed that T:)

chseagle Tue Dec 29, 2009 03:50pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by j51969 (Post 646637)
What if the player were pregnant? T for six in the game, first. A1 is fouled on a try for a goal by pregnant player B1 and B1/2. Is this a multiple foul?

If the T is before the shooting foul, any active A player can shoot the FTs. Then A1 would shoot the FT for the foul.

Did A1 make the try?

Also does the 6th player on the court for B have a legal jersey on?

Back In The Saddle Tue Dec 29, 2009 04:04pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by chseagle (Post 646679)
If the T is before the shooting foul, any active A player can shoot the FTs. Then A1 would shoot the FT for the foul.

Did A1 make the try?

Also does the 6th player on the court for B have a legal jersey on?

Ummmm, the "sixth player" is the unborn child. ;)

j51969 Tue Dec 29, 2009 04:07pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by chseagle (Post 646679)
If the T is before the shooting foul, any active A player can shoot the FTs. Then A1 would shoot the FT for the foul.

Did A1 make the try?

Also does the 6th player on the court for B have a legal jersey on?

We are exspecting a physicians note for the player who had concussion a game earlier. He is providing an ultra-sound for the six player concerning the jersey question. Gender will also be determined. What if it's male? Is there a case play for that?

Adam Tue Dec 29, 2009 04:12pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by j51969 (Post 646695)
We are exspecting a physicians note for the player who had concussion a game earlier. He is providing an ultra-sound for the six player concerning the jersey question. Gender will also be determined. What if it's male? Is there a case play for that?

2-3 baby! T's all around. One for each coach just because I like the seat belt.

Oooh, rule change idea! Coach loses ability to request TO with first T, along with losing the coaching box.

BillyMac Tue Dec 29, 2009 06:45pm

Interesting ...
 
The athletes of the WNBA are the best of the best, and their league has a supportive pregnancy policy. Not every athlete is so lucky. Take Darnellia Russell, a high school player in a new documentary about a girls' basketball team from Seattle.

In "The Heart of the Game," directed by Ward Serrill, the Roosevelt High Roughriders are stuck in the losing column until tax professor and novice coach Bill Resler walks into their lives. He gives them permission to be competitive and ruthless on the court allowing the team to thrive. When Darnellia enrolls and walks into the gym, Coach Resler, a father of daughters, smells her talent. The team's wins pile up, even with Darnellia playing most of her junior year pregnant without knowing it.

Darnellia gave birth to her daughter Trekayla in December 2002. When she tried to return to the team as a senior, she had too few academic credits to play because of missed school during her pregnancy. She made up the credits, yet still was denied eligibility under Washington state rules that govern high school athletics -- her pregnancy was not a "hardship," a designation that would allow her to make up the credits and qualify. Darnellia had hoped, through an athletic scholarship, to fulfill her dream of becoming the first in her family to go to college. She had letters of interest from a number of schools before she got pregnant. After the baby the interest pretty much disappeared, and with it, Darnellia's dreams of a college education and maybe even the WNBA.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:53pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1