Alternating-Possesion

gracealone919

Is it an alternating-possesion throw-in following simultaneous basket interference violations by opponents.

just another ref

Yes: 6-4-3f

Has anyone actually seen this call?

mbyron

just another ref wrote
Yes: 6-4-3f

Has anyone actually seen this call?

No. The rule exists only to fill a gap in logical space and to provide a challenging test question.

just another ref

mbyron wrote
No. The rule exists only to fill a gap in logical space .............

This point is debatable. I submit that "logical space" has no gaps.

mbyron

just another ref wrote
This point is debatable. I submit that "logical space" has no gaps.

Yeah, well you probably deny the Copenhagen interpretation too... 😛

just another ref

mbyron wrote
Yeah, well you probably deny the Copenhagen interpretation too... :p

I might........if I knew what it was.

Raymond

just another ref wrote
I might........if I knew what it was.

I just looked it up and I still don't know what it is. Copenhagen interpretation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

M&M Guy

just another ref wrote
I might........if I knew what it was.

Isn't it the interpretation that Madrid will be the Center of the Universe in 7 years?

Adam

M&M Guy wrote
Isn't it the interpretation that Madrid will be the Center of the Universe in 7 years?

No, it's that Rio De Janeiro will be the center of the universe in 7 years. Madrid and Chicago, well, too bad.

Welpe

BadNewsRef wrote
I just looked it up and I still don't know what it is. Copenhagen interpretation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Is this a foul or violation? I'm confused...

just another ref

Copenhagen is what guys buy when the store is out of Skoal. Then some of 'em find out they're not as manly as they thought.

Just a pinch between cheek and gum, can knock you on your keester.

M&M Guy

Snaqwells wrote
No, it's that Rio De Janeiro will be the center of the universe in 7 years. Madrid and Chicago, well, too bad.

Huh, you're right.

Leave it to me to screw up an off-topic comment...

jkumpire

Welpe wrote
Is this a foul or violation? I'm confused...

Welpe,

It is neither one, or both, or whatever you chose it to be based on your observation of the data. 😛

Therefore it depends what team you are calling the foul or violation on! Or, on a much deeper level, if your assigner is evaluating you or not. 😛

mbyron

jkumpire wrote
Welpe,

It is neither one, or both, or whatever you chose it to be based on your observation of the data. 😛

Therefore it depends what team you are calling the foul or violation on! Or, on a much deeper level, if your assigner is evaluating you or not. :p

That's about as funny as a dead cat. 😛

Welpe

mbyron wrote
That's about as funny as a dead cat. :p

Leave Schrodinger alone. 😉

mbyron

Welpe wrote
Leave Schrodinger alone. 😉

OK, but only if you spell his name correctly. 😛

Welpe

OK OK...Schrödinger, you meanie pants. 🙂