The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Auerbach and Jackson vs Referees - a difference? (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/53697-auerbach-jackson-vs-referees-difference.html)

grunewar Fri Jun 19, 2009 05:05am

Auerbach and Jackson vs Referees - a difference?
 
The article (link below) compares Phil Jackson to Red Auerbach and contrasts their styles and eras. I thought the below excerpts were interesting:

"The relationship between the referees and the coaches has also drastically altered through the years. It used to be Standard Operating Procedure for coaches to loudly and viciously curse and threaten refs with violence during games, with Auerbach universally conceded to be the worst offender. During Auerbach's early days on the bench technical fouls cost a coach a mere $25. So when an enraged Auerbach would storm into the officials' locker room after a loss and rudely challenge Sid Borgia to fisticuffs, he was only fined $25."

"Compare this to the $25,000 penalty Jackson has to pay for questioning the authenticity of referees' calls during an in-game interview."

Entire article comparing the two is at:

Phil vs. Red: Who's the NBA's best coach ever? - FOX Sports on MSN

Adam Fri Jun 19, 2009 09:16am

Things may be better now, but Jackson is still a baby.
And Krewshewooskie is an a$$.

Ref Ump Welsch Fri Jun 19, 2009 01:47pm

One must remember, Red was doing his boisterous yelling and screaming with a cigar sticking out of his mouth at times.

BillyMac Fri Jun 19, 2009 06:07pm

Let's Take Closer Look At This ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by grunewar (Post 609773)
During Auerbach's early days on the bench technical fouls cost a coach a mere $25. So when an enraged Auerbach would storm into the officials' locker room after a loss and rudely challenge Sid Borgia to fisticuffs, he was only fined $25. Compare this to the $25,000 penalty Jackson has to pay for questioning the authenticity of referees' calls during an in-game interview.

Red Auerbach's annual salary for his first season with the Celtics, 1951-52, was $10,000. A fine of $25 would represent 0.25% of his annual salary.

Phil Jackson's annual salary is reported to be $10.33 million, the highest salary for a head coach in the NBA. A fine of $25,000 would represent 0.24% of his annual salary.

Looks like the NBA fines for coaches have been pretty consistent over the years.

Camron Rust Sat Jun 20, 2009 02:50am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BillyMac (Post 609910)
Red Auerbach's annual salary for his first season with the Celtics, 1951-52, was $10,000. A fine of $25 would represent 0.25% of his annual salary.

Phil Jackson's annual salary is reported to be $10.33 million, the highest salary for a head coach in the NBA. A fine of $25,000 would represent 0.24% of his annual salary.

Looks like the NBA fines for coaches have been pretty consistent over the years.

Perhaps as a percentage of total income, but $10.33 million in 2009 is dramatically (300x) more the median US income while $10k in 1952 (about $65,000 in today's dollars) was a about 3x the median income.

Red's fine would have been a bigger impact than Phil's. It didn't hurt red, but it wasn't like it was pocket change.

Of course, you compared Red's first season salary with Phil's current salary, but that is a different issue. It would have been a better comparison to use Red's final salary or Phil's first salary.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:44pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1