The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Fundamentals discrepancy? (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/53420-fundamentals-discrepancy.html)

sseltser Fri May 29, 2009 08:56am

Fundamentals discrepancy?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Basketball Rules Fundamentals
10. Personal fouls always involve illegal contact and occur during a live ball, except a common foul by or on an airborne shooter.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4-1
Airborne Shooter
1. An airborne shooter is a player who has released the ball on a try for a goal or has tapped the ball and has not returned to the floor.
2. The airborne shooter is considered to be in the act of shooting.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 5-1
A goal is made when a live ball enters the basket and remains in or passes through.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 6-7
The ball becomes dead, or remains dead, when
1. A goal, as in 5-1, is made.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 10-6-Penalties
1. No free throws
a. For each common foul before the bonus rule is in effect.
...
2. One free throw if fouled in the act of shooting and two- or three-point try or tap is successful.


This ended up being more typing than I thought it would be, but I wanted to capture all of the pertinent rules.

The issue I have with Fundamental 10 is that there can be a dead ball (because of 6-7 and 5-1) personal foul on an airborne shooter that is not common. A common foul carries with it a penalty of no free throws, while a foul on an airborne shooter following a goal would carry a penalty of one free throw.

Therefore, I conclude that "common" should be removed from fundamental 10.


OK - lay it on me: did I miss something?

Vinski Fri May 29, 2009 09:29am

Boy, aren’t we picky.
However, I agree. If you look at rule 4-19-2 it says…

ART. 2 . . . A common foul is a personal foul which is neither flagrant nor intentional nor committed against a player trying or tapping for a field goal nor a part of a double, simultaneous or multiple foul.

This clearly shows that a foul is not considered a common foul if against a player trying for a goal, which an airborne shooter is a player trying for goal.

Nevadaref Fri May 29, 2009 04:12pm

I agree with your agreement.

Now can someone please show me in the rules where it says to award the first FT (not the bonus attempt) for common fouls 7, 8, and 9 by a team in a half? :eek:

Texas Aggie Fri May 29, 2009 07:26pm

Its there by implication: "if first free throw is successful."

I agree it could probably be worded better.

AKOFL Fri May 29, 2009 11:55pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Texas Aggie (Post 605563)
Its there by implication: "if first free throw is successful."

I agree it could probably be worded better.

Bonus only happens if the first throw is made. I wonder what we should call the first throw? Could it be your earned shot? Since the second is given as a bonus. :rolleyes:

Camron Rust Mon Jun 01, 2009 12:08pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by AKOFL (Post 605618)
Bonus only happens if the first throw is made. I wonder what we should call the first throw? Could it be your earned shot? Since the second is given as a bonus. :rolleyes:

How about a Free Throw....which may followed by a Bonus Free Throw...or possibly an Automatic Bonus Free Throw.

tomegun Tue Jun 02, 2009 02:18am

I hope an elephant isn't missed because of dealing with this ant.

Adam Tue Jun 02, 2009 10:21am

Quote:

Originally Posted by tomegun (Post 606148)
I hope an elephant isn't missed because of dealing with this ant.

I get a kick out of the stuff that gets discussed in the off season.

Mark Padgett Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:14am

Quote:

Originally Posted by tomegun (Post 606148)
I hope an elephant isn't missed because of dealing with this ant.

Nope. They're buddies.

http://www.elephantadv.com/html/images/ele_ant.gif

Nevadaref Tue Jun 02, 2009 06:11pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by tomegun (Post 606148)
I hope an elephant isn't missed because of dealing with this ant.

You mean like the next time that I'm working a game and the 7th, 8th, or 9th team foul of the half is a common foul causing the coach to plead for the 1-and-1, but I tell him that there is no rule in the book which instructs me to award a FT. :D

just another ref Wed Jun 03, 2009 12:01am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nevadaref (Post 605540)
I agree with your agreement.

Now can someone please show me in the rules where it says to award the first FT (not the bonus attempt) for common fouls 7, 8, and 9 by a team in a half? :eek:


10.6.1 Situation B:

The bonus is in effect...........A2 charges into B1.



Ruling:..............B1 is then awarded a one-and-one.

M&M Guy Wed Jun 03, 2009 10:02am

Quote:

Originally Posted by just another ref (Post 606376)
10.6.1 Situation B:

The bonus is in effect...........A2 charges into B1.



Ruling:..............B1 is then awarded a one-and-one.

Research or memory? :D

just another ref Thu Jun 04, 2009 11:42pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by M&M Guy (Post 606415)
Research or memory? :D

Did research for the cite. Memory tells me that based on board history, Nevada should be back to say this doesn't count for some reason.

Nevadaref Fri Jun 05, 2009 04:42am

Nah, I'll just ask, "According to what RULE is B1 awarded a one-and-one in that situation?" :D


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:22am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1