Originally Posted by BillyMac (Post 597718)

For those of you who still have the issue, did the writer state that the defender had to be "set", and is this the correct rule in the NBA?

Originally Posted by grunewar (Post 597749)

I don't know the NBA Rule. But, according to the author, he states, in a split second the ref must determine: a) were the defender's feet set, b) was he outside the court's semicircle, c) who initiated contact, and d) does the contact merit a call at all?

Originally Posted by Camron Rust (Post 597741)

Actually, the newspaper's website IS selling it and making a profit from it. It is just that the people paying for it on your behalf are the advertisers.

Publishers track the number of times people click on the headlines/summaries to read articles. The publishers use those stats to price their advertising space. Perhaps they also use it to see who's articles are the most read and, by that measure, the most valuable...perhaps being used to decide who to keep and who to let go. When anyone takes such an article from such a site and posts it elsewhere, they author doesn't get "credit" for the number of people who've read it....and who've seen the adverts that paid for it. If content gets copied to other sites too much, the original source makes no money from their advertisers and goes under and those that simply copied it are still around and copy from somewhere else.

On the other hand, a short summary and a link is the perfect solution. It let's people know what the story is and those that are interested can click through to the original site. Still free, and the author gets appropriate credit.

Originally Posted by icallfouls (Post 597683)

You do know that newspapers are dying out right? They have been for nearly a decade or more. We cannot help when people make bad career choices. Maybe Obama could help him out, I hear that he is giving away lots of money right now.

Originally Posted by jbduke (Post 598021)

How completely appropriate that someone so incomprehensibly ill-informed--and therefore in such dire need of high-quality reporting--would go so far out of his way to dump on professional journalism (one of the most noble of professions) and its most important medium.

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett (Post 598088)

I thought that the most important medium of professional journalism was bathroom walls. That's where I get most of my information. ;)

Originally Posted by jbduke (Post 598021)

How completely appropriate that someone so incomprehensibly ill-informed--and therefore in such dire need of high-quality reporting--would go so far out of his way to dump on professional journalism (one of the most noble of professions) and its most important medium.