![]() |
I think it was deliberate
|
Quote:
while we're not in a court of law - I'd have to say the "preponderance of the evidence" leads me to believe the Florida player was correctly charged w/ the foul (both had some responsibility - the Florida player had the majority of it, imho) |
Quote:
Art. 3. A player shall not: a. Cause contact by setting a screen outside the visual field of a stationary opponent that does not allow this opponent a normal step to move. b. Make contact with the opponent when setting a screen within the visual field of that opponent. c. Take a position so close to a moving opponent that this opponent cannot avoid contact by stopping or changing direction. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:56pm. |