The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   What is the purpose of the Black Boxes NCAA Officials wear during games? (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/51018-what-purpose-black-boxes-ncaa-officials-wear-during-games.html)

VaZebra Sat Jan 17, 2009 03:34pm

What is the purpose of the Black Boxes NCAA Officials wear during games?
 
I was just curious. Does anyone know what the purpose of the black boxes that NCAA Officials wear during the games? I suspect it has something to do with the starting of the clock or the shot clock. I have not been able to confirm this by searching the web.

shishstripes Sat Jan 17, 2009 03:42pm

Remote timers, NBA and NCAA D-1 use them. Maybe some of the NCAA officials here can tell us how they work.

ace Sat Jan 17, 2009 04:28pm

do a quick search of the forum for Precision Timing System or PTS and you'll get all of the information you're looking for!

agr8zebra Sat Jan 17, 2009 04:50pm

They are on there just in case the Lead get lost on the crowd, baseline or the paint... You know just like the jets..

BktBallRef Sat Jan 17, 2009 05:14pm

Precision Timing System
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by VaZebra (Post 569675)
I was just curious. Does anyone know what the purpose of the black boxes that NCAA Officials wear during the games? I suspect it has something to do with the starting of the clock or the shot clock. I have not been able to confirm this by searching the web.

You press the button on the bottom of the box to start the clock.

A microphone attached to the lanyard just below the whistle stops the clock when the whistle blows.

tjones1 Sun Jan 18, 2009 12:24am

Read all about it here: http://www.precisiontime.com

If you ever get a chance to talk to Mike, do it! He's a great guy.

Nevadaref Sun Jan 18, 2009 07:34am

Quote:

Originally Posted by tjones1 (Post 569743)
Read all about it here: http://www.precisiontime.com

If you ever get a chance to talk to Mike, do it! He's a great guy.

"When an official blows the whistle, the belt pack recognizes the frequency of the FOX 40 whistle and sends a radio signal to the base station receiver that is connected to the scoreboard controller, stopping the clock at the speed of light."

Wouldn't that mean that the clock gets stopped at the speed of sound? :confused:

JugglingReferee Sun Jan 18, 2009 07:50am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nevadaref (Post 569770)
"When an official blows the whistle, the belt pack recognizes the frequency of the FOX 40 whistle and sends a radio signal to the base station receiver that is connected to the scoreboard controller, stopping the clock at the speed of light."

Wouldn't that mean that the clock gets stopped at the speed of sound? :confused:

No. But the clock is not stopped at the speed of light, either. The belt device can't do it's thing until it receives a signal, a signal which travels at the speed of sound from the whistle to the device. From there, a radio frequency signal stops the clock. That signal travels much faster than the speed of sound.

Edit: the radio frequency signal to stop the clock doesn't work at c, because by definition c is measured in a vacuum. Since we have the atmosphere to contend with, the speed at which the belt device stops the clock is < c.

South GA BBall Ref Sun Jan 18, 2009 04:33pm

I have actually used the PTS in the state tournament (private school) in GA and all is correct as indicated above with the exception of the frequency of the Fox 40. Actually it is the force of the air from the whistle that causes the transmission of a signal to stop the clock. A common procedure to make sure the transmitter is working prior to the start of the game is to blow a burst of air across the microphone to stop the clock.

BktBallRef Sun Jan 18, 2009 04:59pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by South GA BBall Ref (Post 569855)
I have actually used the PTS in the state tournament (private school) in GA and all is correct as indicated above with the exception of the frequency of the Fox 40. Actually it is the force of the air from the whistle that causes the transmission of a signal to stop the clock. A common procedure to make sure the transmitter is working prior to the start of the game is to blow a burst of air across the microphone to stop the clock.

Correct. We have close to a dozen schools that use it. Blowing air into the mic stops the clock. It has nothing to do with the frequency of the whistle. But I guess they think it sounds more technical.

Scrapper1 Sun Jan 18, 2009 11:11pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by South GA BBall Ref (Post 569855)
Actually it is the force of the air from the whistle that causes the transmission of a signal to stop the clock.

Wasn't there a game in a conference tournament last year in which the clock stopped because an official was talking to a player?

Nevadaref Sun Jan 18, 2009 11:45pm

Is the product seller correct in his claim?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JugglingReferee (Post 569771)
No. But the clock is not stopped at the speed of light, either. The belt device can't do it's thing until it receives a signal, a signal which travels at the speed of sound from the whistle to the device. From there, a radio frequency signal stops the clock. That signal travels much faster than the speed of sound.

Edit: the radio frequency signal to stop the clock doesn't work at c, because by definition c is measured in a vacuum. Since we have the atmosphere to contend with, the speed at which the belt device stops the clock is < c.

I actually find this discussion interesting. The limiting factor in the whole process is whatever transmission is the slowest. We know that the whistle is making a sound wave in the air that is picked up by the microphone. There is then a relay of that detection to the belt box. That relay could be by fiberoptic or simple electronic. I don't know. Finally, the seller states that the box sends a radio wave signal to the control console. That is clearly done at below the speed of light. So I am saying that his claim that the clock is stopped at the speed of light is clearly false.
PS Lastly, the control console must receive the radio signal and then transmit something to the device that stops the clock.

Perhaps one of our esteemed members knows something about radio waves and how they are generated and can tell us at what speed they travel. I think that they are sound waves and thus cannot travel faster than the speed of sound.

eyezen Mon Jan 19, 2009 12:32am

Not and esteemed member but...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nevadaref (Post 569949)
Perhaps one of our esteemed members knows something about radio waves and how they are generated and can tell us at what speed they travel. I think that they are sound waves and thus cannot travel faster than the speed of sound.

Put simply radio waves and light waves are both forms electromagnetic radiation that differ only in frequency. They both travel at "the speed of light" which Juggles correctly stated is less than "c" in an atmosphere.

Now frequency becomes important when the waves travels through a medium (again in simple terms a radio wave will slow down going through a wall but a light wave is completely stopped) but in this scenario is unimportant.

Sound waves are a different animal, they are compressions of the air around us and when those differences hit our eardrums we "hear" those differences. Hence why sound doesn't propagate in space.

Nevadaref Mon Jan 19, 2009 12:57am

Quote:

Originally Posted by eyezen (Post 569967)
Put simply radio waves and light waves are both forms electromagnetic radiation that differ only in frequency. They both travel at "the speed of light" which Juggles correctly stated is less than "c" in an atmosphere.

Now frequency becomes important when the waves travels through a medium (again in simple terms a radio wave will slow down going through a wall but a light wave is completely stopped) but in this scenario is unimportant.

Sound waves are a different animal, they are compressions of the air around us and when those differences hit our eardrums we "hear" those differences. Hence why sound doesn't propagate in space.

Thanks. That is the kind of physics knowledge that I am seeking. I was wondering if radio waves were electro-magnetic. That makes much more sense than them being a physical product of the atmosphere such as the noise made by a passing car.

Now what is the speed of radio waves in a vacuum? Is it c or something less? Do electro-magnetic waves travel at different speeds or all at the same speed regardless of frequency?

I guess that I need to do some research on light waves as well. I never grasped that they were simply electro-magnetic radiation. I always thought that light was a physical substance that existed and traveled in wave form. I never did understand exactly what constituted a wave particle. I know that I had an excellent college physics class (taught by the Dean of Yale's physics department), but I must not have fully comprehended what was being taught regarding this.

Freddy Mon Jan 19, 2009 01:33am

How 'bout a Vice Versa?
 
Whereas I'd bet we'll all be magically stopping the clock with our whistles, even on the high school level, sooner rather than later, I can see a just as great a benefit being able to have the clock started by an official at precisely the proper time.
Seems there are just as many unfortunate instances of the timer not starting the clock properly as vice versa.
Do you think that will be coming down the pike someday? Will we have to add "little black boxes" to our Christmas list, right below "air needle" and "keeps-the-shirt-from-coming-out-of-your-pants rubber belt with knobbies all over"?

LDUB Mon Jan 19, 2009 01:47am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nevadaref (Post 569949)
Perhaps one of our esteemed members knows something about radio waves and how they are generated and can tell us at what speed they travel. I think that they are sound waves and thus cannot travel faster than the speed of sound.

Radio waves are light.

http://electromagnetic-waves.com/ima...rum%20copy.jpg

JRutledge Mon Jan 19, 2009 02:01am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Freddy (Post 569976)
Whereas I'd bet we'll all be magically stopping the clock with our whistles, even on the high school level, sooner rather than later, I can see a just as great a benefit being able to have the clock started by an official at precisely the proper time.
Seems there are just as many unfortunate instances of the timer not starting the clock properly as vice versa.
Do you think that will be coming down the pike someday? Will we have to add "little black boxes" to our Christmas list, right below "air needle" and "keeps-the-shirt-from-coming-out-of-your-pants rubber belt with knobbies all over"?

Well the problem is that these devices are very expensive. And with the financial trouble out country is in or the many school districts across the country, I do not think we will ever see this as a mainstay across the country in the coming years. Colleges make millions, they can afford thousands of dollars for a device that will decide who will make more millions.

Peace

BillyMac Mon Jan 19, 2009 07:50am

Bang !!! Boom !!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by eyezen (Post 569967)
Hence why sound doesn't propagate in space.

You must be wrong. I can hear those spaceships blowup in every one of those Star Wars, and Star Trek, movies.

mbyron Mon Jan 19, 2009 08:42am

Don't get too excited about the gap between the speed of light in the atmosphere and the speed of light in vacuum (which has 3 syllables, BTW). The former is 99.97% of the latter, which is certainly close enough for government work.

The speed of an electronic signal through wire is also at least 96% of c, which again is close enough, where c is about 671 million mph.

The slowest signal in the PTS system is the transmission of sound from the whistle to the microphone, which moves at a measley 760 mph (though the speed of sound varies somewhat depending on altitude, barimetric pressure, etc.).

For comparison, the speed of nerve impulses in a human timekeeper is no more than 100-200 mph, or about 3 million times slower than c.

JugglingReferee Mon Jan 19, 2009 09:17am

If one were to aggregate the time delays in an NBA game due to the PT system stopping the clock, it wouldn't surprise me if the value was much much less than the resolution of the display, and certainly much much less than what the human eye can perceive in terms of legally released on a try/tap for goal.

refguy Mon Jan 19, 2009 10:17am

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 569985)
Well the problem is that these devices are very expensive. And with the financial trouble out country is in or the many school districts across the country, I do not think we will ever see this as a mainstay across the country in the coming years. Colleges make millions, they can afford thousands of dollars for a device that will decide who will make more millions.

Peace

The system costs about a grand and the batteries cost about $200 a season. The guy makes all his money on the batteries every year. (His batteries are specialized for the system.)

BktBallRef Mon Jan 19, 2009 10:42am

Unless Mike has drastically reduced the price, it's closer to $2500. The batteries are a huge issue. Each set lasts about two games before needing replacement. The batteries are available from other vendors at lower prices but you agree to buy them from PTS. I know of two schools that got tired of the expense and sent it back.

JugglingReferee Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:22am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BktBallRef (Post 570063)
Unless Mike has drastically reduced the price, it's closer to $2500. The batteries are a huge issue. Each set lasts about two games before needing replacement. The batteries are available from other vendors at lower prices but you agree to buy them from PTS. I know of two schools that got tired of the expense and sent it back.

I took a look at their website and immediately suspected that the batteries would be proprietary. There's nothing like residual income. . . :cool:

eyezen Mon Jan 19, 2009 12:16pm

That website is definitely updated at some value < c

observer Mon Jan 19, 2009 12:59pm

As an observer, I am somewhat not real happy with the devices.
Or possibly "rules" should be made up to utilize the boxes.
I see too many (almost all) D1 officials reach for the magic button
on the belt devices to start the clock...Even the official that administers
the throw-in...Thus, one of his/her hands is used to hand the ball to
the thrower, the other hand is on the devise...No hands left to start
or chop the clock. Not every official on the floor needs to start
the clock on every position.

LDUB Mon Jan 19, 2009 01:02pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by observer (Post 570118)
Thus, one of his/her hands is used to hand the ball to
the thrower, the other hand is on the devise...No hands left to start
or chop the clock.

Why would the official signal for someone else to start the clock when he could push a button and start it himself?

observer Mon Jan 19, 2009 01:08pm

That's my point, all three officials at the same time
reach for the magic button to start the clock. Wonder
how they all know when to start on the touch in bounds
when the ball is not thrown into their primary area?

JRutledge Mon Jan 19, 2009 01:10pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by observer (Post 570125)
That's my point, all three officials at the same time
reach for the magic button to start the clock. Wonder
how they all know when to start on the touch in bounds
when the ball is not thrown into their primary area?

Part of the system has the clock being activated by someone at the table. So it has been suggested that you use similar mechanics as usual to allow the table as well as all 3 officials starting the clock when necessary.

Peace

Back In The Saddle Mon Jan 19, 2009 03:24pm

Like Jess mentioned, it's the standard government-required "little black box." It is used to monitor NCAA referees, ensuring that they don't log too many miles in a single day, that they're taking required rest breaks, and that they're not traveling too fast. NTSB inspectors are currently evaluating the data from Steve Welmer's little black box after he suffered a serious mechanical failure during a game recently. :D

Back In The Saddle Mon Jan 19, 2009 03:32pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by observer (Post 570125)
That's my point, all three officials at the same time
reach for the magic button to start the clock. Wonder
how they all know when to start on the touch in bounds
when the ball is not thrown into their primary area?

Well, let's think about this for a minute.

In standard 2 person high school mechanics, the administering official chops the clock. No matter where the ball goes, no matter whose primary it ends up in. So a throw-in from the baseline (hehehe, just twisting the tails of the "endline" folks) to the division line will have both the lead, who administered the throw-in, and the trail, whose area it landed in, watching on-ball. At least briefly.

In NCAAW, a throw-in on the end line has the L administering and counting 5 seconds, while the T is supposed to keep at least a partial eye on the throw-in because he has the chop. If the throw-in goes into the L's area or the C's area, the T is having to look over there to watch for the first touch.

That's nearly as appalling as all three officials starting the clock when using PTS.

But then, the reality is it just isn't that big a deal for any official to sneak a peak at the throw-in. If we didn't, how would we know whose area the throw-in is going to? As a non-administering official, how would I know to pick up a throw-in that came into my area if I'm not keeping at least a partial eye on the throw-in?

In other words, it's a non-issue.

BktBallRef Mon Jan 19, 2009 03:40pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by observer (Post 570118)
As an observer, I am somewhat not real happy with the devices.
Or possibly "rules" should be made up to utilize the boxes.
I see too many (almost all) D1 officials reach for the magic button
on the belt devices to start the clock...Even the official that administers
the throw-in...Thus, one of his/her hands is used to hand the ball to
the thrower, the other hand is on the devise...No hands left to start
or chop the clock. Not every official on the floor needs to start
the clock on every position.

That's not the mechanic, nor is it an issue.

Let's say the thrower is tol my left. I place my right hand on the button and administer the ball with the left hand and immediately bigen the count. When the ball is released, I stop counting and raise the left hand to chop the clock. When the ball is legally touched, I press the button and chop. It's that simple.

The pother officials pressing the button is just a backup as is the timer doing the same thing at the table. Neither of the other two is a primary starter. It's just to insure that the clock starts. If you're on the floor and you don't know the ball has been legally touched, you need to pay better attention to what's going on.

dbking Mon Jan 19, 2009 03:43pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by observer (Post 570118)
As an observer, I am somewhat not real happy with the devices.
Or possibly "rules" should be made up to utilize the boxes.
I see too many (almost all) D1 officials reach for the magic button
on the belt devices to start the clock...Even the official that administers
the throw-in...Thus, one of his/her hands is used to hand the ball to
the thrower, the other hand is on the devise...No hands left to start
or chop the clock. Not every official on the floor needs to start
the clock on every position.

That is why the mechanic on throw in is different in NCAA, NAIA and NJCAA. You only use one hand to count with and chop. It takes a few throw ins to get used to and then you really like.

Brad Mon Jan 19, 2009 04:26pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by South GA BBall Ref (Post 569855)
...all is correct as indicated above with the exception of the frequency of the Fox 40. Actually it is the force of the air from the whistle that causes the transmission of a signal to stop the clock.

Sorry, but that is not correct.

The system listens for three distinct tones from the Fox 40 whistle and stops the clock. I met Mike a long time ago at a camp in Tennessee where he was demonstrating the system. In fact, he mentioned to me that Fox 40 and him made some sort of agreement so that it would work with their whistles -- otherwise he was going to come out with his own whistle as well! :)

The system will not stop just because air is blown into it... If it did that it would be stopping all the time falsely!


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:19pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1