What was (is) the purpose of the division line?
There is a line that goes across the court that we call the "division line." As we have discovered in another thread, this line is not used to determine where players must stand for free throws as a result of technical fouls.
What was the original intent of this line? I am trying to establish a "base line" (not to be confused with the "end line") for a discussion. |
It used to be use for 6-on-6 basketball where certain players could not cross over the division line. I'm too young to have ever seen this played though
-Josh |
the division line is the determination of of front court (offense) and back court (defence) as well as refered to as time line in FED and NCAAM NBA where you have a specific amount of time where you may have the ball in the back court during any possession. 10 sec (8 sec NBA)
The division line once posssesion is established beyond this point determines where certain offensive rules come into play such as closely guarded, FED and NCAAM, as well as back court violations in all. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Correct. That was the original purpose. |
Red Rover, Red Rover
Don't hear the term "rover" much anymore, do we? (Iowa folks might be the only ones who remember that).
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I dare Freddy over . . . |
Quote:
Ciao |
Quote:
|
Quote:
3 on 3 on each side. No rovers. 3 forwards, 3 guards, none of which could cross the division line. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
so the trail official knows when to stop moving forward?
|
Quote:
Rita |
Quote:
But I've heard of other areas where it was 3 and 3. Rita |
My understanding of the division line was to limit the amount of space that the offensive team had in which to play keep-away.
Before returning to the backcourt became a violation and the 10 second limit in the backcourt was established, it was nearly impossible for the defending team to get the ball away from the offensive team if they didn't wish to try for goal. The game needed a proper balance between the offense and the defense so the amount of space in which the offensive team could operate was reduced. This restored the balance and gave the defending team a legitimate chance to steal the ball. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I would have to look it up, but I believe 6-on-6 basketball actually started before the division line rule in 1933, which means it's original intent was for 6-on-6. Also, I believe Iowa was the first state to use it, then others adopted it but made modifications. Iowa's was 3 offense and 3 defense, because I remember the defense having to pass the ball to their offensive players across the division line. I'll look up the date on 6-on-6's creation to make sure, but then again, I could be wrong.
|
Quote:
Was there also a 3 dribble limit? |
Just looked it up (I'm an academian so the temptation hit me as soon as I posted a few minutes ago). Iowa started playing 6-on-6 girls basketball in 1919-20. It was the only game in the state for the girls until 1984-85, when they added a 5-player class. The 1992-93 season was the last for 6-on-6. The following season (93-94), they split into 4 classes for 5-player ball.
That would be pretty good evidence that the original purpose for the division line was for 6-on-6 basketball, because it predates the 1933 rule change creating the division line for the purpose of the 10-second count. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Semantics, but, I think you guys are comparing Granny Smith's with Washington Reds. If the boys games never played 6v6, the introduction of the division line had no effect on them regardless of it purpose for the girls game. (It was just another volleyball line in the court). Once the boys decided they needed to limit the space that the offense could work in, they decided that a line that was already marked on the court would work fine. The line has two original purposes, one for boys and another for girls. |
Quote:
I believe there used to be a version (somewhere?) that divided the court into three parts. Two guards, two forwards, and two in the center area for each team. I had thought they started 5 on 5 in Iowa in the late 70's (with the big schools), but I'll defer on that. |
Quote:
Rita |
Quote:
Rita |
In Iowa 6 on 6, a dribbler could only legally bounce the ball two times (thus two dribble limit) before she had to stop and hold the ball.
Outside the lane, it was illegal use of hands to touch the ball while being held by an offensive player. I do remember it wasn't uncommon for scoring averages to be obsurdly high since all the offense was spread just three ways instead of five. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
One of the main selling points in pulling them into the late 20th century was the fact that the rules were costing a lot of girls college basketball scholarships. They were too specialized; forwards couldn't play defense, guards couldn't shoot the ball, and none of them could really handle the ball. |
Quote:
It's possible that that rule predates the 10-second limit, and thus could have been the original reason for the introduction of the division line on the boys side. If that's true, then in order to Ref Ump Welsch's argument to hold up the backcourt restriction would have to have entered the game post 1920. It's possible that he using the wrong rule from the boys' side for comparison. |
Quote:
|
Netball?
Quote:
|
Fwiw
Quote:
|
Yeah it's funny, most people think that netball a a derivative of basketball, but it was actually invented first. It is becomi g increasingly popular as a mixed sport in Australia, it is a great sport for basketballers to play to improve their shooting - there's no backboard!
|
Quote:
|
I used to know a girl who played 6-on-6 in Iowa. She was recognized as an All-State player, and never scored a point in her career. She was strictly a defensive player. Kind of weird to hear it that way!
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:16pm. |