Is NFHS Case Book Play 2.10.1 Sit. G(d) (re: corr. error situation) really an error?
 

Below is an excerpt from a memo posted on the Texas Association of Sports Officials (TASO) - Basketball division's website:

NFHS CASE BOOK UPDATE
Page 11. Play 2.10.1 Situation G(d) is incorrect. By rule, there is no player control during a throw-in, and the alternating possession provisions of rule 4 Sec. 36 art. 2(c) would apply.

Here's the Case Book situation in question:
A1 is fouled prior to the bonus, but erroneously A1 is awarded a one-and-one. The error is discovered: d.) after B1 has the ball for a throw-in after both attempts are successful. Ruling: d.) The successful free-throws are canceled and play continues with a throw-in by Team B as Team B had the ball when the game was interrupted for correction.

I've tried to confirm if any other resource had identified an error in the Fed's publications but I have not been successful. That's why I'm coming to the "brain trust" for your help. Is this case book scenario really an error...or does the TASO website have it wrong. Thanks for your help.

No. That play ruling is correct.

Most of us here believe that the new 2.10.1 Situation D is the one that is incorrect.

That is why they conflict.

That's the situation (D) TASO says is incorrect. Since I posted this I did find some other threads on "correctable errors" and I now know a little more about how people feel on this subject. Would it be correct to say that the main disagreement is not really about the correctness of the Case Book Ruling (Team A points canceled and Team B's ball) but rather the fairness of the Ruling...???

Never mind...I see my error. It is not "Situation D" that TASO questions...but "Situation G". I see what you mean by conflicting...sorry for the confusion.