![]() |
2 person
should be easy to answer but i have not done 2 person in 5 yrs, so im curious. In two person do you long switch?? calling foul in backcourt going the other way..
|
Quote:
|
we don't where i am
|
BY the mechanics book, in 2-man you switch every time. It depends on your association. We do not long switch on any back court fouls.
|
thats what i thought but my partner last night night said he always does. SO by the book in 2 person ur suppose to long switch??????
I know they changed it for 3 person a few yrs back not to long switch, but i thought they did for 2 person also |
Quote:
|
By the book... you switch on every foul - including long switches. I'm still a rookie but any time I'm with a partner that works primarily 3-man, they don't want to long switch. Our association decided no long switches in 2-man.
|
I could have sworn they changed the book on this, but I can't find it. I do know long switches are frowned upon here.
|
We do it, with some rare spontaneous exceptions.
|
I believe that a few years ago the NFHS flip-flopped on this, first removing it from 2 person, then restoring it a couple of years later. I always pre-game that we will not do the long switch. And it's not just to eliminate 50 unnecessary extra steps. It's to prevent both officials from remaining in the backcourt while all 10 players are headed to the front court. IMHO that's just not smart.
|
Quote:
|
I've never understood why the Fed has kept long switching in the 2-man mechanics. There's an exception in 3-man, may as well be in 2-man, too.
No long switches accomplishes two things - easier dead-ball officiating (one official gets to keep his eyes on the entire court without worrying about heading to the other end) and provides a more efficient process. Currently the off-call official can choose to be an excellent dead-ball official by freezing until after the reporting and then heading to the other end, but that obviously comes at the expense of efficiency. Heading immediately to the other end comes at the expense of dead-ball officiating. Enough rambling. You get my point. If you care at all. I certainly don't after wasting my time writing this. Glad I only work 3-man... :D |
Only In The Land Of Steady Habits ...
CONNECTICUT (IAABO) MECHANICS:
Point to floor for two-point field goal try when shooter has foot touching three point line. No long switches when foul is called in the backcourt and there is no change of possession or direction. Team members are not allowed to congregate at midcourt during introductions. Officials will direct players to free throw line area in front of respective benches. Coaching Box must be marked. If home coach and/or home management refuse to designate coaching box with tape, the home team will not use a coaching box for that game. However, the visiting team will be allowed a coaching box. Notify Board Secretary, or Commissioner the next day. |
Quote:
When I work 2-man, I switch every time. I say do it right. If one is too lazy to hustle and give that effort, then one shouldn't be out there. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
This is something the NFHS could and should switch. There's really no point in the long switch considering the situations in 3 person where NONE of the officials move. I've worked hard to incorporate more NFHS mechanics that have eluded me the past few years, including stopping the clock on out of bounds calls and not blowing a whistle on the baseline throw-in. I'll let you know what happens if I ever have a pregame dunk. :D |
Quote:
BTW I don't like the NFHS 3-man switching mechanics mainly because there are too many situations in which none of the officials swap spots. I much prefer the NBA mechanic in which the calling official comes to the table and the other two officials switch. This changes it up with greater frequency and this is desirable. |
Quote:
|
Ok, I'll take your word for it. ;)
|
Is there really an issue with NFHS/NCAA style switching in 3 person? Is it really necessary to switch like the NBA does to ... actually, what is the goal of the NBA switch?
|
Quote:
|
Though theoretically it could be the same ONE guy, since s/he becomes T after every foul call, he'll become L once the ball goes the other way. Actually, in a really sadistic way, that would help ensure consistent calls at each end. ;)
|
I have heard both explanations from differing sources in my association. It seems to vary between "no long switches- period" to "no long switches unless we're shooting". I've been pregaming this. Results have varied.
I dunno... Despite the manual, it seems strange for me to be at midcourt when my partner calls a foul in backcourt on a press, then reports and heads the rest of the way to administer while I stand there, watch players and then take 2-3 steps to my position during the FTs. Makes me feel like I'm not doing anything. Z |
Officials Manual 2.4.2.E.1.
"Officials should switch position on all fouls. No exceptions." We normally don't make long switches, despite the Manual instruction. |
No Long Switches ...
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:29pm. |