Calling Time out
 

2001-2002 Interps Part 2.

SITUATION 12: Team A has used all allotted time-outs. The scorer notifies the referee, who properly advises the Team A coach at the beginning of Team A’s last called time-out. During play later in the game, A4 attempts to call time-out when he/she is being pressured by B2 and 83. U2 ignores the request by A4. RULING: U2 should honor the request of A4, even when this would be a time-out in excess of the number allotted. Game officials do not have discretionary authority to assist players in avoiding rules violations. (2-7-6; 5-12-2)

Calls time out??!!?? You mean it's in writing somewhere from the FED?

I don't have to walk on eggshells anymore waiting for the nitpick police to tell me I need to say Request Time Out not Call Time Out??!!!

:D:D:D

:D

Feel free to use terms like "over the back" and "reach" as well. :P

And see how far that gets you!:eek:

OK....Reaching Fouls (well possible technical foul):

2000-01 Interps -- Part 2 of 3

SITUATION 15: Immediately following a goal in the first quarter by Al, A3 slaps the ball away so that Team B is unable to make a quick throw-in. In the second quarter, A2 reaches through the inbounds side of the throw-in boundary plane. RULING: The official shall sound his/her whistle and go to the table to have the scorer record a team warning for the specific delay after it has occurred. The specific warning is then reported to the head coach of Team A. Any subsequent delay for interfering with the ball following a basket or throw-in plane violation by Team A shall result in a technical foul charged to Team A. COMMENT: The three warning situations listed in Rule 4-46 are treated separately. (4-46; 9-2-11; lO-1-5c,d)

Not sure I'll ever find an "over the back" though:mad:

The "reach" is not what the warning is for CoachP. Its the delaying of the game the team is getting a warning for.

I know, I know....but the Juggler told me to feel free to use the term.;)