Fri Oct 03, 2008, 12:57pm
|
 |
Keeper of the HAMMER
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zm1283
You're right. I didn't mention that.
I did think of this though: If Team B violates and Team A shoots a no-rimmer on the first of two shots, is it a simultaneous violation? B does violate, but is it even a violation on A since it's the first of two free throws? Wouldn't you call a violation on B and re-shoot the first free throw?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zm1283
What are you implying that I don't know or am missing? We've already covered the cases that you posted. I have a case book and I know that rule.
I was asking about the first of two free throws, not the final free throw, which is what your first situation is referring to.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zm1283
I realize that, but if it's the first free throw where a simultaneous violation occurs you don't go to the arrow. That's the point I was getting at.
|
If you know this, why did you ask the question? I guess I'm confused about what your real question is.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
|
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode
