The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Burr???Welmer??? (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/42969-burr-welmer.html)

biz Sun Mar 23, 2008 12:06am

Burr???Welmer???
 
Now I know that Steve Welmer is obviously not highly thought of by the NCAA (see the fact that he has never worked a Final Four and rarely works beyond the first weekend), but Jim Burr does not appear to be working in this year's tournament.

That's right Jim (freaking) Burr...Hank Nichols, you do remember assigning him to work 15 Final Fours, right? How do you not give him a game? He is obviously available, he worked NIT games last week (along with Welmer).

I have to believe that Mr. Burr was ranked pretty high by the commissioner's he worked for. In fact he worked the Big East tournament final with Bob Donato and John Cahill who both got assignments in the NCAA tourney.

Doing some further research there are two other prominent officials who have worked deep in the tourney in the past who did not get any assignments this year: John Higgins, and Steve Olson. Two very respected officials who I am very surprised aren't at the "Big Dance."

Any info or ideas on the reasons for these apparent snubs? Could it be the coach's box/bench decorum POE????

tjones1 Sun Mar 23, 2008 12:15am

Read the other threads. There was a computer error and I believe some paper work did not get filed so that's why he was not assigned.

JRutledge Sun Mar 23, 2008 12:19am

Quote:

Originally Posted by biz
Doing some further research there are two other prominent officials who have worked deep in the tourney in the past who did not get any assignments this year: John Higgins, and Steve Olson. Two very respected officials who I am very surprised aren't at the "Big Dance."

Any info or ideas on the reasons for these apparent snubs? Could it be the coach's box/bench decorum POE????

Actually we do not disagree at all, but you obviously do not know how to read very well and comprehend what you read so your response does not surprise me.

But like TJ said, there was a computer mistake and many guys were left out.

Peace

biz Sun Mar 23, 2008 10:05am

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge
Actually we do not disagree at all, but you obviously do not know how to read very well and comprehend what you read so your response does not surprise me.

But like TJ said, there was a computer mistake and many guys were left out.

Peace


Sorry guys I missed the thread about the paperwork/computer mistake...Still too bad I'm sure that Jim Burr had quite a long streak going of working the tournament. Any word on whether they are going to rectify the situation in some way?

Rut, Is the above directed at me?? Doesn't seem like it is so until you tell me different I'll assume that you were responding to someone else.

26 Year Gap Sun Mar 23, 2008 01:21pm

Computer mistake? Is that how Roger Rabbit got in there?;)

TRef21 Sun Mar 23, 2008 03:13pm

Higgins worked the UCLA vs. Texas A&M game. Burr and Welmer are probably going to come in the regionals. I haven't seen Dick Cartmell work either. I think they are saving those guys for the reginonals, semis, and finals. Then they will probably fill the crews with guys who are working the 1st and 2nd rounds.

zebraman Sun Mar 23, 2008 04:13pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRef21
I haven't seen Dick Cartmell work either. I think they are saving those guys for the reginonals, semis, and finals. Then they will probably fill the crews with guys who are working the 1st and 2nd rounds.

Cartmell worked round 1 and 2. Way too good to be sitting.

BktBallRef Sun Mar 23, 2008 04:40pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRef21
Higgins worked the UCLA vs. Texas A&M game. Burr and Welmer are probably going to come in the regionals. I haven't seen Dick Cartmell work either. I think they are saving those guys for the reginonals, semis, and finals.

Nope, that's not the way it works. If you're good enough to work the Swwet 16, Elite 8 or Final 4, you work the 1st two rounds as well.

cornhole21 Sun Mar 23, 2008 04:53pm

What type of paperwork was not sent in? If they were legal all year they sholud call in the big dance!

tjones1 Sun Mar 23, 2008 05:05pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by cornhole21
What type of paperwork was not sent in? If they were legal all year they sholud call in the big dance!

I think it had something to do with background checks. No, because during the season they are hired by conferences, that's the difference.

cornhole21 Sun Mar 23, 2008 05:12pm

I guess their background changes from year to year, they look like shady guys?

BillyMac Sun Mar 23, 2008 05:14pm

Criminal Background Checks ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tjones1
I think it had something to do with background checks. No, because during the season they are hired by conferences, that's the difference.

tjones1 is correct. Jim Burr didn't turn in the paperwork for his criminal background check, probably due to this photo of him from fifteen years ago. This is not his usual referee uniform, as he would want you to believe. Note that the stripes on the jersey are going the wrong way. He also wants us to believe that he forgot his all black pants, his black socks, and that the school didn't provide a secure place for him to store his bracelets. He has his back to us in the photo, but I've been told by an unnamed, reliable, source, that this is really Jim Burr.

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2373/...6de042.jpg?v=0

tjones1 Sun Mar 23, 2008 05:15pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by cornhole21
I guess their background changes from year to year, they look like shady guys?

Guess so, thank Timmy Dumbas* (Donaghy) for that one.

LeeBallanfant Sun Mar 23, 2008 08:14pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by tjones1
I think it had something to do with background checks. No, because during the season they are hired by conferences, that's the difference.

So I guess its ok to fix an NIT Game, but not NCAA

bob jenkins Sun Mar 23, 2008 08:17pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeeBallanfant
So I guess its ok to fix an NIT Game, but not NCAA

WTF? That doesn't make any sense to me.

LeeBallanfant Sun Mar 23, 2008 08:22pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bob jenkins
WTF? That doesn't make any sense to me.

Why is he allowed to officiate in the NIT and not the NCAA. Different standards??

mightyvol Sun Mar 23, 2008 08:25pm

Bob:

You need to calm down. Its not worth it letting these guys get to you.We understand that the officials that are selected to do these games are giving their best effort, the ones that dont think that are obviously fans.

TRef21 Sun Mar 23, 2008 09:08pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BktBallRef
Nope, that's not the way it works. If you're good enough to work the Swwet 16, Elite 8 or Final 4, you work the 1st two rounds as well.

I know that's how it works... Sorry i forgot to put that in. I was thinking since it was Hank Nichols last year, maybe he wanted to do things a little different.

HawkeyeCubP Sun Mar 23, 2008 09:50pm

Someone post a photo of Jim Burr for me, please. I like putting faces to names.

BktBallRef Sun Mar 23, 2008 09:55pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by HawkeyeCubP
Someone post a photo of Jim Burr for me, please. I like putting faces to names.

You're kidding....right?

You don't know who Jim Burr is?

JugglingReferee Sun Mar 23, 2008 10:52pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by HawkeyeCubP
Someone post a photo of Jim Burr for me, please. I like putting faces to names.

Are you really that lazy? It's quite easy to do yourself, you know...

JRutledge Sun Mar 23, 2008 11:03pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeeBallanfant
Why is he allowed to officiate in the NIT and not the NCAA. Different standards??

Because the NCAA is not the same people or organization that runs the NIT and certainly do not assign the officials the same way. The background checks are for the tournament, not all levels of basketball.

Peace

Raymond Sun Mar 23, 2008 11:19pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeeBallanfant
So I guess its ok to fix an NIT Game, but not NCAA

what's your point?

bob jenkins Mon Mar 24, 2008 07:02am

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeeBallanfant
Why is he allowed to officiate in the NIT and not the NCAA. Different standards??

Different requirements / different process / different organizations.

AFAIK, no one (at least, no official) has been accused of fixing any NCAA or NIT tournament games.

Scrapper1 Mon Mar 24, 2008 07:43am

Quote:

Originally Posted by HawkeyeCubP
Someone post a photo of Jim Burr for me, please. I like putting faces to names.

Jim Burr is the one who's NOT whining like a baby. . .

http://blog.syracuse.com/axeman/2007...heimvsburr.jpg

LeeBallanfant Mon Mar 24, 2008 08:30am

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge
Because the NCAA is not the same people or organization that runs the NIT and certainly do not assign the officials the same way. The background checks are for the tournament, not all levels of basketball.

Peace

From the NIT website:

"A new chapter in the long and storied history of the NIT unfolded in August 2005, when the NIT, L.L.C., which is owned by the NCAA, took over the tournament reigns."

Obviously no English professor made it to their committee.

fullor30 Mon Mar 24, 2008 08:38am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scrapper1
Jim Burr is the one who's NOT whining like a baby. . .

http://blog.syracuse.com/axeman/2007...heimvsburr.jpg


"HEY REF, NO HITCH HIKING ALLOWED"

Dan_ref Mon Mar 24, 2008 08:42am

So just for the heck of it i did a google search on Jim Burr images... I can see why there might be some confusion over what he looks like because google included this picture in what they sent back to me:

http://www.redsoxtimes.com/blog/wp-c...rinandrews.jpg

Scrapper1 Mon Mar 24, 2008 09:01am

I have to admit that I'd never heard of Erin Andrews, but she's much nicer to look at than Jim Burr.

Dan_ref Mon Mar 24, 2008 09:08am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scrapper1
I have to admit that I'd never heard of Erin Andrews, but she's much nicer to look at than Jim Burr.

Geeze. Madeline Albright is nicer to look at than Jim Burr.

Adam Mon Mar 24, 2008 09:17am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan_ref
Geeze. Madeline Albright is nicer to look at than Jim Burr.

Now that's a stretch.

Dan_ref Mon Mar 24, 2008 09:24am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells
Now that's a stretch.

Yeah you're right.

My apologies to Mr. Burr.

fullor30 Mon Mar 24, 2008 09:42am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan_ref
So just for the heck of it i did a google search on Jim Burr images... I can see why there might be some confusion over what he looks like because google included this picture in what they sent back to me:

http://www.redsoxtimes.com/blog/wp-c...rinandrews.jpg


Hubba Hubba Va Va Voom (for you old school guys out there)

Mark Dexter Mon Mar 24, 2008 10:04am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan_ref
So just for the heck of it i did a google search on Jim Burr images... I can see why there might be some confusion over what he looks like because google included this picture in what they sent back to me:

And you're complaining why?

Adam Mon Mar 24, 2008 10:06am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scrapper1
I have to admit that I'd never heard of Erin Andrews, but she's much nicer to look at than Jim Burr.

Good lord, Scrappy, this may go down as the understatement of the century.

JRutledge Mon Mar 24, 2008 10:31am

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeeBallanfant
From the NIT website:

"A new chapter in the long and storied history of the NIT unfolded in August 2005, when the NIT, L.L.C., which is owned by the NCAA, took over the tournament reigns."

Obviously no English professor made it to their committee.

The NCAA may own the NIT, but it is not assigned by the same people. I know for a fact the background checks only involve the NCAA Tournament. The NIT does not determine the champion of all of college basketball. So yes, there would be a difference in standards or requirements to work the NIT. Not sure why that would be hard to understand.

Peace

fullor30 Mon Mar 24, 2008 12:17pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge
The NCAA may own the NIT, but it is not assigned by the same people. I know for a fact the background checks only involve the NCAA Tournament. The NIT does not determine the champion of all of college basketball. So yes, there would be a difference in standards or requirements to work the NIT. Not sure why that would be hard to understand.

Peace

I think his point was the word in bold should be reins.

Raymond Mon Mar 24, 2008 12:57pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by fullor30
I think his point was the word in bold should be reins.

LeeBallanfant usually doesn't have a point.

fullor30 Mon Mar 24, 2008 03:36pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef
LeeBallanfant usually doesn't have a point.


That's why I love this site............I learn something everyday;)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:20pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1