If you want to know how you did, just ask the coach that just won.

I would take that a step further. Many officials do not care what coaches think about foul counts at any time of the game. I mainly concern myself with foul counts to know if we are close to a bonus situation. Outside of that if a coach complains, it is not going to change anything. Actually, most complaining coaches engage in means little or nothing but takes away their credibility.

IMO When the players play consistently, the officials have a much better chance at calling the game consistently. The inverse of this is also true.:cool:

Just to add to this point, let me relay something I was told by a D1 official several years ago:

D1 coaches, for the most part, are control freaks. They have control of a multi-million dollar budget, control of a large arena and practice facility, and control of the lives of those 12 or so kids playing for them. About the only thing they don't have control of is those three guys running around their court in striped shirts. This drives them crazy and they are willing to go to almost any length to try to gain control to their advantage.

When you look at it from that angle, it's no wonder that D1 coaches think the officiating is uniformally bad across the board.

BITS,

I know that this doesn't apply to all coaches but I'll say it anyway. Coaches aren't the best judges of officials during their own specific game. They just can't be objective and they can't separate their own bias toward/against their team. A foul against their team becomes "we teach them to block out". A travel aganst their team becomes "we teach that move". A missed layup becomes "if things weren't so physical, she would have made that". It's almost like a call goes against their ability to coach.

If they are watching a game not involving their team, they have a little more insight than a fan. Other than that, there is nothing in their background that makes them qualified to even rate an official.

With that being said, we have a very successful experience with coaches becoming officials after they tire of coaching. They do understand the game.

Mulk

Complaining about the foul count is about as sure a way as any to get me to tune a coach out. It's a "crying wolf" scenario. Same as the coach who never really says anything across the line, but always wants a travel, or 3 seconds, or "watch the handchecking" every other trip down the court. It eliminates that coach's ability to get my attention to question something legitimately.

I had a freshman level game a couple weeks ago where I was trail for free throws and the coach wanted to complain because his team had 3 fouls and the other team had none 2:30 into the game. I just leaned over and said, "Coach, I'll be happy to talk to you about legitimate questions or rules applications when I can, but if you want to talk about the foul count I'm pretty good at tuning that out and it's hard to get my attention back."

It worked in that game. I normally wouldn't have said anything, but it got that coach focused on the game, and he had just 2 or 3 "complaints" the rest of the night, all of which came with pretty good questions we could answer.

This is an interesting topic. It is good to hear things from a coach's perspective. I fall into the category of officials that doesn't really put much stock into comments from coaches. If they say, "nice job" I say "thank you." I'm more concerned with the other officials I work with and the assignors I work for thinking I do a quality job.

I'm not ever worried about foul count. Foul count is a direct representation of style of play...For example if one team is playing a man-to-man full court trapping game while the other team is playing a passive 2-3 zone, then the team pressing is probably going to commit far more fouls. My experience is that foul counts are almost always representative of the type of game. If the game is tight foul count is usually close, and if it isn't, it never is the fault of the game officials.

What I'm talking about with consistency is if you start the game calling hand-checking closely then you better continue to call the same type of hand-checks throughout the game. If you start the game by letting a lot of contact go then don't come up with a touch foul late.

The players will adjust to the way the game is being called, so therefore it is vital (and I'm saying this as a coach and an official) that the officials call apply the rules in a consistent manner.

Good Point ...
 

Good point. New officials, please take note. This allows the officials to be extra careful about correctly identifying the shooter. It also helps avoid the dreadful: "Blue ball". Blue throws in. Horn sounds. Table makes a one and one sign. We look like idiots. Good way to prevent many correctable errors.

Besides that? Nothing. Nuff said.

Which one are you?

http://www.streetswing.com/histmain/histitl/1snf1.jpg

Good One ...
 

Mark Padgett: Good one. Maybe your best of the week. I'm sure glad that the writer's strike is finally over, and we can now get your best material fresh on the Forum, instead of those terrible reruns.

Hey, hey, hey - what was so terrible about Rerun?

http://profootballtalk.com/Rerun.jpg

Please Stop ...
 

Please stop it. You're killing me. I may end up like this guy:

http://re3.yt-thm-a04.yimg.com/image/25/m8/4037784329