The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 13, 2008, 09:00am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 156
Quote:
Originally Posted by Referee24.7
Also, consider this -- anything 0.3 and under has to be a tap for goal or otherwise disregarded -- when that foul was sounded, did the Tennessee player:

A) Have the ball in her hands or B) Did she release it?

If she released it and the ball goes through, even with the clock stopped at 0.2, that shot would be waved off being that you CANNOT have a shot at that time on the clock.

Just my $.02 cents worth.
This is not the case when the ball is live. I believe that this is only applicable when there is less then 0.4 on the clock and the ball is dead.

Back on page 2 #18 I posted the exact times that everything happened.

The Tennessee player first makes contact with the ball on the rebound at 0.4. She is just landing from the rebound at 0.2. The Rutgers player makes contact to start the foul 0.3 seconds after the clock stops (so it would have been after 0.0)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Another game ending sitch Blackhawk357 Basketball 10 Fri Jan 07, 2005 01:16pm
Game ending controversy... rynodawg Baseball 31 Sat Sep 25, 2004 02:33pm
Tennessee-Baylor ending sphinxicu Basketball 162 Fri Apr 09, 2004 09:58pm
Game Ending BooBoo whiskers_ump Softball 4 Fri May 02, 2003 12:14pm
Tennessee-Louisiana game Jeremy Hohn Basketball 2 Sun Mar 19, 2000 09:51am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:18am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1