![]() |
This almost happened
NF rules. A1 in back court throws ball toward front court. It hits an official who is standing in front court and rebounds back to A1 who grabs it while still in the back court. Is this a violation?
Remember the four elements needed for a back court violation: 1. There must be team control 2. The ball must have achieved front court status 3. The team in team control must be the last to touch the ball after it has achieved front court status 4. That same team must be first to touch the ball after it has reentered the back court No doubt about 1 and 2. But does a single touch by A1 when he catches the rebounded ball in the back court satisfy both 3 and 4 at the same time? That is, can a single touch count for two elements simultaneously? This almost happened in a game this weekend, but the ball caromed off the official into the back court and went OOB with A1 leaping for it. |
why not?
|
T/C on the pass. Hits official in the F/C which established T/C F/C status of the ball. If A touches-violation.
|
Quote:
3. Team A last to touch before the ball goes to BC There's a specific case play just like yours in which it's a violation. |
It is under fiba rules
|
What if ??
SO the OP is a violation. What if the official has one foot in the F/C and one in the B/C? Off the top of my head I'm thinking no violation is this case.
|
Quote:
What is the status of player standing exactly the same way? |
Both player and official would have B/C status so no violation.
|
Quote:
This is where I offer you the picture of the cookie, and say, "Good job!". But I was hungry this afternoon and already ate the cookie. Sorry. |
Obviously an M&M cookie.
|
Obviously. :D
|
Is there rule support for treating the official's location on the court (that is, backcourt vs. frontcourt) the same as a player's?
|
Quote:
|
What if a player with one feet in the front and one in the bc passes to a player standing the same way (test question)?
What if it's a throw in with the player doing the throw-in standing one fott in Back one in Front- court and he passes to a player standing the same way(answer here is diffrent in NCAA compared to FIBA due to team control definition)? |
Quote:
|
Don't have the current casebook, but looking at the '05-06 one, which has a play where the scenario is the same except the ball hits the opponent rather than an official. The casebook play says that's legal, so how is hitting the official different since Team A was not the last to touch the ball in the front court?
|
Quote:
See 4.4.4 (2006-2007 reference "Ball Touches An Official") |
Quote:
If a player is located in both Back and Frontcourt and passes to a teammate standing the same way that is a backcourt violation... Think of it, when do you get FC status? That is when you move into the frontcourt in some way (one foot, the ball, your hand, something). Once you are in the FC are you allowed to go back? No when do you return? When you in any way contact the B/C you are in the B/C So if you have one foot in the frontcourt, you're in the F/C If you then passes somebody who has one foot in the B/C, the ball has been returned to the B/C That's a violation Quote:
That also means that if you are in the B/C, throws the ball of the backboard (I have one friend who has seen this happen! No idea what the player was thinking but still) and then gets it back still in the B/C, that is a violation You're in the B/C The ball goes in the F/C (since it touches something in the F/C, the backboard) Then it returns to the B/C You are still in control. Violation |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If you have contact with the F/C you are in the F/C Just the same thing as if you are in the F/C and just touch the B/C you are in the B/C Or if you just touch OOB then you are OOB So if you have one feet in both places you will essentially be in both places, how ever being in both places doesn't mean you can pass the ball back to the B/C, becuse you are still partially in the F/C I'm not sure how to explain it really... |
Quote:
This is true Crazy. You are missing my point that it is legal to be touching both areas when you receive the initial pass. It is the NEXT action that will determine the violation or not. We are not that far apart on this one.:) |
Quote:
You can't be "partially in the F/C, just like you can't be partially out of bounds. If anything is touching the backcourt, you have backcourt status. |
Quote:
In the Sit we are talking about the player receives the pass while touching both sides of the center line. (legal in all rules) However what is done next determines if they violate in FIBA. This is how it was explained to me this year. As we have just converted to FIBA rules it was important that we understand how to handle this exact situation. We did not cover what if the player who received the pass, then made another pass to a teammate who was in the same stance. I have sent a clarification to our National Interpreter. We shall see what they say. |
ah, we might have interpeted it diffrently then. I meant it like this
A player is standing with the ball straddling the middle-line (s)he then passes to a player who is also straddling the line. off course the first pass is legal. But passing to a player standing the same way is a violation |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:54pm. |