Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge
If a school assigns their own games, then if there is a change at those positions and they know officials in and around the area, they can hire who they have had a relationship with. That happens all the time where I started. And it would have nothing to do with your ability or any incident. You would not work at that school because the AD would hire people he or she already had a relationship with.
|
OK. I understand what you were saying. I suppose that happens, although I have never heard of it happening. However if I have a contract and for some reason they don't want to honor it thats OK, they still have to pay me the game fee. The IHSAA demands this! I will say that has never happened to me or anybody that I work with!
Quote:
I am not saying you have to be worried about it. But at least when you have an assignor or association, there is a filter before you are banned. The assignor might know the reputation of the coach and not honor the request. Or like Tony said, the have to show some proof other than, "I just do not like this guy."
|
Agreed! I work @ the collegiate level where if a coach has a problem with something you have done in the game then my supervisors would require the game film to substantiate the complaint. So certainly I can see the advantage to this part of it assuming that the high school assignor would actually take the time to view the film. I say that because that hasn't been the case with one of the few assignors in Indiana!!!
Quote:
The point I am trying to make is that that system you think is so wonderful has its pitfalls. And being in a state that boarders you, there are many people that are uncomfortable with the system.
|
I hope you understand that I'm not saying your wrong!!! I want to be clear!!! I'm not saying our system is so WONDERFUL!! Just I prefer this system for HIGH SCHOOL! I happen to live in a area where both are used, with assigning being the minority! In one of the assigning systems there really isn't any thought given to how far away the school might be and if you happen to turn the game back then your likely to lose all of your games for that one particular assignor!
His thought process is that if he assigns you a game then you better take it or else. I know of officials who have driven 3 hrs to work a $60.00 high school game for fear of losing the rest of their schedule. They are in a catch 22. They don't have any games of their own, the assignor knows it, leverages that to his/her advantage and puts the official in a very precarious situation!
Not to mention if you happen to put all of your eggs in that one assignors basket where you depend on him/her for all of your games and that assignors loses the job, quits, & the replacement (if there is one) doesn't know/use you then they are in the very situation you said they could get in with changes @ the AD/Coach level, however unlikely that may be. That official then could end up with very few games if he/she loses the assignors games. Which would jeopardize the tournament. In Indiana unless you have worked a certain number of Varsity contests you can't work the post season tournament.
Quote:
I do not know how long you have been working or what levels you work, but that might be the reason you are happy now about the system.
|
Don't get me wrong I can tell you plenty of things that I don't like about it, for example, the coaches have all of the power in who works/doesn't work the postseason tournament. Unlike @ the lower collegiate level where the final decision is on the supervisor or @ the DI level the NCAA committee.
Quote:
I agree that working with the same people has its advantages, but it also might not challenge you either. A lot of people that work together do not question the judgments of others and you have to work hard to do that. I work with some guys often right now and I do not mind working with different people. If I am going to go where I want to go, I will not have the choice all the time and that does not bother me one bit.
Peace
|
Your right working with the same partners has its advantages, more then not!! My partners and I are overly critical of one another. We spend a lot of time breaking down film talking plays, each others plays, what we need to do to get better!! We wouldn't have it any other way.As far as challenging myself, well I get plenty of different partners @ the collegiate level.
Just @ the high school level your more likely to get inexperienced officials on a game if you don't bring your own partners. Especially if its a new AD who doesn't know officials or how they work and schedules with just about anybody who calls him/her for a game. That doesn't mean we don't take newer or less experienced officials with us to do games, it just has to be on the right game, right time & @ the right time in relation to where their officiating ability is.
We only schedule games where we can bring our partners or if there happen to be officials on the game that we know who can manage/handle that game. If there happens to be officials on the game that we don't know or are familiar with then we just pass on the game.
@ the collegiate level its the opposite! Your less likely to have games with partners who really shouldn't be there. Supervisors are hiring officials that they have seen work somewhere.
Like I said before I'm sure both systems have pro's/con's, just @ the high school level I prefer this system with all of it's flaws.