The Test....
Ok.. so I sent in my test... I thought I did really well... ya.. no!! I got a 70.. WTF...
I went over 2/3 of it with a very senior official who is on the rules commity.. and did the rest out of the book.. the only thing I could think of is that maybe I misaligned the numbers or somthing. I could not have done that poorly... :confused: I'm going to my clinic this weekend, and I'll retake it after that. Just venting a little. thanks. :mad: |
Prior to my test in 06', I bought an Athletic Rules Study program for basketball. In this program it had 5 years worth of old test questions. It was tremendous, helped me get a 96 and should do you a lot of good as well.
|
I tool a small quiz once. It was called a "quizzical". Maybe you should take a small test? :rolleyes:
|
It is an open book test!!! Why did you not just go over the test with your association before you submitted the results? You do not need to buy a program to do that. I have a group that goes over the test before our association discusses the test to make sure we all go over the test so that our scores are not in the tank. Before anyone starts going off, this is a widely acceptable practice and has been in many cases encouraged. This is not a test that is expected to be taken in a dark room all by yourself.
Peace |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Oh, and how did you tool it? |
Quote:
I dont know what happened. Very frustrating cause I understand the rules. I read the posts here and understand eveything you are talking about. Oh well.. Like I said.. I'm going to the hands on clinic this sat and they have the rules interpretation meeting at the end. I'll take the test again after that. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Peace |
Is this the first year you took the test? As most of us would agree, the test questions are not always the most clearly written statements you will ever read. The first couple of times you do it can be tough. After a while you get used to their format and get to know what they expect. Don't beat yourself up for it too much.
|
Quote:
|
These questions are worded in a way that makes them purposefully more difficult. I think they do this so you need more than just a cursory knowledge of the rules to pass it. You need to actually understand the individual rules.
The trade-off is that the questions are sometimes too confusing. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
The real issue is that they're written in technical terms instead of the general laymens terms which all too many people (including officials) think. They're trying to expose the real rule and get the officials to know the rule itself instead of the most common application. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:15am. |