Least called call

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

Sigh.....

For the life of me, I don't know why I'm wasting time with you over such a basic and simple rule that you simply can't understand. You just can't comprehend what you're reading.

You might have stopped right there.

[Old School]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

Hey, I know the answers. I've got a better idea. You tell me the difference between a flagrant personal foul and a personal technical foul. You tell me also what the right call should be in your post of 8:59am this morning--post #20 of this thread. And you tell me what the call is if one of the multiple fouls called is a flagrant personal foul.

And I'm still waiting to find out if you still insist that a technical foul of any kind can actually be part of a multiple foul under the rules, as you claimed above.

That'll show everybody that you really do know what you're doing. I await your answers.

That's okay, don't answer my question. In fact it's already been answered. Throw-in spot! That's the only difference. Now, do you really want to make a big issue over whether it was a personal or a technical when the only difference is the throw-in spot?

Some of us have better things to do then to quibble over such minor differences. The main thing here, which I got is 2 shots and the ball back, player disqualified. If you want to have a pissing contest over whether we take it out on the baseline or halfcourt. Remember, that's the only difference here. Then I will concede and save you the fluid.

You're still wrong about the part where you don't shoot unless you're in the bonus. Did you think I forgot about that? Oh, and one more thing, I never called a technical foul. I said the next time I will call a technical foul and be done with it. No multiple nothing. Last thing, please try not to take this

PERSONAL!!

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Old School

That's okay, don't answer my question. In fact it's already been answered. Throw-in spot! That's the only difference. Now, do you really want to make a big issue over whether it was a personal or a technical when the only difference is the throw-in spot?

There is more. Who shoots is also a difference, and you can bet your game fees it will be a big deal to the coaches. Also, don't underestimate the importance of the throwin spot; especially if the flagrant personal happened during an attempt for a layup.

Originally Posted by Old School

Some of us have better things to do then to quibble over such minor differences. The main thing here, which I got is 2 shots and the ball back, player disqualified. If you want to have a pissing contest over whether we take it out on the baseline or halfcourt. Remember, that's the only difference here. Then I will concede and save you the fluid.

Again, and only for affect, it's not the only difference; nor is it insignificant.

Originally Posted by Old School

Oh, and one more thing, I never called a technical foul. I said the next time I will call a technical foul and be done with it. No multiple nothing.

You're the one who said you had a multiple foul. Did you or did you not call a multiple foul on the situation you posted about?

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

I've got a better idea. You tell me the difference between a flagrant personal foul and a personal technical foul.

Is this a trick question?

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by just another ref

Is this a trick question?

No, brain fart. Went back and changed it.