The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Another Basket Interference Thread (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/37390-another-basket-interference-thread.html)

dblref Thu Aug 09, 2007 05:47am

Quote:

Originally Posted by rainmaker
Well, I don't do men's college, but I do say "bleep" instead of the much more obnoxious and adolescent *******.

There are those moments when the much more obnoxious and adolescent ************ is very rewarding.:)

rainmaker Thu Aug 09, 2007 09:24am

Quote:

Originally Posted by dblref
There are those moments when the much more obnoxious and adolescent ************ is very rewarding.:)

I suppose that's true for the much more obnoxious and adolescent among you....:p

Dan_ref Thu Aug 09, 2007 10:03am

Quote:

Originally Posted by rainmaker
I suppose that's true for the much more obnoxious and adolescent among you....:p

Better that than to be an obnoxious old fart.

Mark Padgett Thu Aug 09, 2007 10:30am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old School
Well, who where you referring too?

Obviously, I was referring to someone who doesn't know the difference between "too" and "to" and also ends a sentence with a preposition. The Spelling & Grammar Squad is on its way. The Punctuation Squad is taking the day off. http://www.runemasterstudios.com/gra...es/naughty.gif

Apparently, so are my meds. http://www.runemasterstudios.com/gra...illy_nilly.gif

rainmaker Thu Aug 09, 2007 11:57am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan_ref
Better that than to be an obnoxious old fart.

Yea, I suppose, but being an old fark, like JR, would be even worse!

Adam Thu Aug 09, 2007 12:42pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by rainmaker
Yea, I suppose, but being an old fark, like JR, would be even worse!

Good point. That could leave one exposed to criterism.

Mark Padgett Thu Aug 09, 2007 01:44pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells
Good point. That could leave one exposed to criterism.

http://www1.bestgraph.com/gifs/anima...moutons-21.gif

Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Thu Aug 09, 2007 07:11pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old School
Hey, don't try to deminish my worth. You're welcome. I'm honored to be the one the stirs the pot to get you to see things more clearly. To help understand why the rules are the way they are. Learning is learning, whether it's on the fly, by making mistakes, or baptism by fire. A wise man once said, what doesn't kill you, makes you better.

On to the topic. Tell me what you think about possibly switching this primary responsiblity to the Lead since the Lead is so much closer to the play. I think by placing the primary for this call on the Trail or Trail/Center, you get put in a situation where you don't want to miss a call in your primary which leads to a tendency to reach out and get that call even though, you don't have a good look at it. I know I've done it. I also know that as the lead in this situation, I have seen just about everybody call a GT or a BI when it wasn't.

Not to mention, touching the ball while it's on the rim is probably not the smartest thing to do as a player. Also, I imagine that if you where following the play but got yourself in position to make a call on the play, your trail was in the backcourt, assuming 2 person. With that being said, the T probably felt like me, this is my primary call and I got to get this call. Beep!!!! I just think that the best person to get this call is the Lead, escpecially if the violation occurs on Lead side. If the violation occurs on C or T side, then they have the primary. Your thoughts.....



OS:

With all due respect. The only time this is the Lead's call is if he is trailing the play on a fast break. Other than that, this is not ever the Lead's call.

MTD, Sr.

dblref Fri Aug 10, 2007 05:37am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan_ref
Better that than to be an obnoxious old fart.

I am proud to say that I am obnoxious, adolescent, and an old fart.:D


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:48pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1