Originally Posted by M&M Guy

Well, half-standing. (Or is that half-baked? ;))

If it is that good of an idea, why isn't it used in both leagues?

Granted, I'm an old fuddy-duddy. I would rather see the decision making process still involved about rather to leave the pitcher in because they're still pitching well, or take them out for a pinch-hitter because the team is behind. What about the double-switch to put that left-handed bat in for later in the game? Or, should the pitcher stay in and sacrafice the runners along? There are so many additional sub-plots involved; I guess I prefer those instead of the simplicity of offense/defense.

Originally Posted by BLydic

BTW, you still hitting a wood driver off the tee? :)

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Looks like A-Rod has his tail between his legs.

Are there odds yet on wheter Boras gets fired?

Originally Posted by mick

Boras gets a lot of money for his players.
He's shopping around for mo money for Kenney Rogers [43, P, DET].

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Except for ARod. My guess is his stunts will have cost ARod money in the end. Apparently, he's only serving in an advisory capacity on this one.

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

What else do agents do but act in an advisory capacity?:confused:

Originally Posted by tjones1

Heard Andruw Jones might be headed to <font color = red>Baseball Heaven</font color>...

Originally Posted by M&M Guy

Wrigley Field?

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

No, that's Baseball Haven. The retirement community for formerly great players.

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

No, that's Baseball Haven. The retirement community for formerly great players.

Originally Posted by M&M Guy

You mean like Lou Brock?

(Ouch! Hey, that one left a mark too...)

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett

No - Brock was not emblematic of the Cubs getting players past their prime, but getting rid of them before their prime.