False Double Foul with Held Whistle

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Mark Dexter

Until the NFHS clarifies this case, though, I do think it's a bit vague, and you could argue going either way. I, however, would administer the technical shots second. No way B is having a chance to get the ball back just because they committed another foul.

This does it for me. The Fed obviously wants us to give B a chance to make a basket and get the two free throws plus the ball here. Why would a personal foul change that? Do the T last.

[RushmoreRef]

Originally Posted by NewNCref

I see that you're trying to make sure that Team B is penalized by losing the ball, but the fact of the matter is, the rule book says you should administer the foul shots in the order in which they occurred. In this case, it all depend on whether you consider the foul to have occurred when the player said the words or when the whistle was blown.

I think by withholding your whistle until it is played out is, in a way, allowing you to penalize the T second.....you are going to call it but allowing A to have the opportunity to score/get fouled....What I'm saying is, the shooting foul happened first and the T second, which gives you the order to proceed and give the ball to A at midcourt after the free throws.

[mick]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

This does it for me. The Fed obviously wants us to give B a chance to make a basket and get the two free throws plus the ball here. Why would a personal foul change that? Do the T last.

Do you care to fix that typo ?

[Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.]

Originally Posted by Mark Dexter

First off, wouldn't this be a false multiple foul? A double foul requires each team to commit a foul. In this situation, both were committed by team B.

Mark:

Gosh yes!! I am so ashamed that I did not catch my own mistake. Kudos to you for catching this one. I am glad someone was doing my job for me, of course I think everybody does my job for me.

MTD, Sr.