The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Is This an Attempt? (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/32662-attempt.html)

cshs81 Sun Mar 11, 2007 07:36pm

Is This an Attempt?
 
Shooter goes up for a 3 pt shot. As he's going up and raising his arms to shoot, the ball goes up in the air and behind him. It ultimately bounces to the backcourt where the shooter tracks it down and is the first to touch.

Do you call it an attempt and, thus, no backcourt violation?

Mark Padgett Sun Mar 11, 2007 07:38pm

Let me pose one to you that's just as hard to answer without seeing it. If, in your instance, he would have been fouled after he started to raise his arms "to shoot" and the rest played out as you described, would you call a shooting foul? :confused:

Answer this and you have the answer to your question.

cshs81 Sun Mar 11, 2007 07:44pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett
Let me pose one to you that's just as hard to answer without seeing it. If, in your instance, he would have been fouled after he started to raise his arms "to shoot" and the rest played out as you described, would you call a shooting foul? :confused:

Answer this and you have the answer to your question.


I did not see the player either. I'm simply going off of a description. However, as I see it in my mind with the player rising to shoot the ball and due to the fact that I don't see an indication of him trying to pass, I'd call it a shooting foul had he been fouled.

Nevadaref Sun Mar 11, 2007 07:46pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett
Let me pose one to you that's just as hard to answer without seeing it. If, in your instance, he would have been fouled after he started to raise his arms "to shoot" and the rest played out as you described, would you call a shooting foul? :confused:

Answer this and you have the answer to your question.

That's not a good way to answer that particular question. Just because the player was going to try for goal doesn't mean that he actually did. If he lost the ball before sending it in flight towards the goal, even though he had been in the act of shooting, then the rules say that team control hasn't ended. Team control ends when the ball is in flight during a try for goal.

There was an NFHS interp a couple of years ago that sheds some light on this.
2003-04 NFHS Interps
SITUATION 5:
At the top of the key, A1 beats B1 off the dribble, reaches
the free-throw line, and pulls up for a jump shot. At the apex
of the jump and before the ball is released, B2 comes from the
side and swats the ball out of A1’s hands. The ball goes
behind A1, deflects off A2 and into the backcourt, where A3 is
the first to touch it. RULING: A backcourt violation shall be
called. Team control had continued for Team A because the try
ended before the ball was in flight. (4-12-3a; 4-40-3,4;
9-9-1)

I have the situation in the original post as a backcourt violation.

cshs81 Sun Mar 11, 2007 07:53pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nevadaref
That's not a good way to answer that particular question. Just because the player was going to try for goal doesn't mean that he actually did. If he lost the ball before sending it in flight towards the goal, even though he had been in the act of shooting, then the rules say that team control hasn't ended. Team control ends when the ball is in flight during a try for goal.

There was an NFHS interp a couple of years ago that sheds some light on this.
2003-04 NFHS Interps
SITUATION 5:
At the top of the key, A1 beats B1 off the dribble, reaches
the free-throw line, and pulls up for a jump shot. At the apex
of the jump and before the ball is released, B2 comes from the
side and swats the ball out of A1’s hands. The ball goes
behind A1, deflects off A2 and into the backcourt, where A3 is
the first to touch it. RULING: A backcourt violation shall be
called. Team control had continued for Team A because the try
ended before the ball was in flight. (4-12-3a; 4-40-3,4;
9-9-1)

I have the situation in the original post as a backcourt violation.

I can see how your example is a violation. However, there is one difference in the play I described: the defender never made contact with the ball. Does that change anything in your mind?

Nevadaref Sun Mar 11, 2007 08:04pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by cshs81
I can see how your example is a violation. However, there is one difference in the play I described: the defender never made contact with the ball. Does that change anything in your mind?

If he didn't release the ball on a try for goal, but instead the ball slipped out of his hands and went backwards, then it wasn't a try--it was a fumble--and thus should be called a violation.

cshs81 Sun Mar 11, 2007 08:13pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nevadaref
If he didn't release the ball on a try for goal, but instead the ball slipped out of his hands and went backwards, then it wasn't a try--it was a fumble--and thus should be called a violation.

So a ball that obviously slips from the shooters hands is never a try, correct?

Nevadaref Sun Mar 11, 2007 08:16pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by cshs81
So a ball that obviously slips from the shooters hands is never a try, correct?

That would be correct. You will have to make a judgment on whether he shot it or it slipped from his hands, but the definition of a fumble is quite clear.

4-21 "A fumble is the accidental loss of player control when the ball unintentionally drops or slips from a player's grasp."

sseltser Sun Mar 11, 2007 08:54pm

Couldn't that also be a travel that occurs at the same time (assuming it was a jump shot)?

Nevadaref Sun Mar 11, 2007 11:28pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by sseltser
Couldn't that also be a travel that occurs at the same time (assuming it was a jump shot)?

NO! Traveling occurs while a player is holding the ball. A player may always recover a fumble without violating.

Adam Sun Mar 11, 2007 11:41pm

The only way you can call this play a travel is if the jump "shooter" purposefully passes rather than shoots, and then retrieves the pass.

Nevadaref Sun Mar 11, 2007 11:47pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells
The only way you can call this play a travel is if the jump "shooter" purposefully <strike>passes</strike>starts a dribble rather than shoots, and then retrieves the <strike>pass</strike>ball.

What you wrote might confuse a newer official or a nonofficial looking to understand the rule. It wasn't wrong, but just unclear because this "pass" turns into a dribble under these circumstances because it meets the definition of such.

Adam Sun Mar 11, 2007 11:59pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nevadaref
What you wrote might confuse a newer official or a nonofficial looking to understand the rule. It wasn't wrong, but just unclear because this "pass" turns into a dribble under these circumstances because it meets the definition of such.

Good point, and the violation would be for lifting the pivot foot without proceeding to shoot, pass, or call timeout. And by retrieving the pass first, the pass becomes a dribble. It sounds much more complicated when I read it out loud as opposed to seeing the play. :)

Nevadaref Mon Mar 12, 2007 12:41am

Yep, and for the benefit of anyone interested:

4-44-3 . . . After coming to a stop and establishing a pivot foot:
a. The pivot foot may be lifted, but not returned to the floor, before the ball is released on a pass or try for goal.
b. If the player jumps, neither foot may be returned to the floor before the ball is released on a pass or try for goal.
c. The pivot foot may not be lifted before the ball is released, to start a dribble.

Jurassic Referee Mon Mar 12, 2007 05:20am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nevadaref
What you wrote might confuse a newer official or a nonofficial looking to understand the rule. It wasn't wrong, but just unclear because this "pass" turns into a dribble under these circumstances because it meets the definition of such.

The situation being discussed above is a judgment call using almost the same criteria anyway. If you judge it a try, then you can legally go into the backcourt and get the ball. If you judge it a fumble <b>or</b> a pass, you can't. You also can't <b>definitively</b> say that it <b>always</b> will be a backcourt violation too imo.

It's no different than casebook play 4.44.3SitB. How do you determine in that case whether the ball was fumbled or deliberately dropped? Answer----> judgment.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:38pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1