The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 23, 2007, 04:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 10
T'd up

I pulled a bonehead move Saturday. Called for a timeout when not in possesion of the ball. I was given the TO and assessed a technical. I had TO's available so that wasn't the issue. From what I can see in the book (5-8-3), I should not have been awarded the TO, and no T should have been assessed. Do I have this right?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 23, 2007, 04:14pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,950
Quote:
Originally Posted by soclueless
I pulled a bonehead move Saturday. Called for a timeout when not in possesion of the ball. I was given the TO and assessed a technical. I had TO's available so that wasn't the issue. From what I can see in the book (5-8-3), I should not have been awarded the TO, and no T should have been assessed. Do I have this right?
No 'T' should have been assessed. Whether or not you should still have been granted a TO depends on which rule set you were using.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR

Last edited by Raymond; Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 04:25pm.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 23, 2007, 04:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,910
What level of basketball are we talking about here? I agree that you should not have gotten the T for this one. The official should have ignored your request, however once they grant the time out, they have to eat it and go explain to the other coach why they granted a TO to you when you didn't have the ball.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 23, 2007, 04:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 600
you get your TO, no "T"

once the TO is granted you get it regardless of whether it should have been granted or not...there is no "T" in this case in any event..
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 23, 2007, 04:22pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by soclueless
I pulled a bonehead move Saturday. Called for a timeout when not in possesion of the ball. I was given the TO and assessed a technical. I had TO's available so that wasn't the issue. From what I can see in the book (5-8-3), I should not have been awarded the TO, and no T should have been assessed. Do I have this right?
Partially.

There shouldn't have been a technical foul issued. Once granted, you're going to be charged with the timeout and you can take it. Case book play 5.8.3SitE.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 23, 2007, 04:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 10
NFHS. Our rec league (7/8 grade boys) uses CA High School rules which are "CIF" but they deffer to NFHS.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 23, 2007, 06:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 696
A referee can call an "inadvertant whistle" and resume play.

I trust your response, rection was professional during this event and did not make the T an option?
__________________
"Sports do not build character. They reveal it" - Heywood H. Broun
"Officiating does not build character. It reveal's it" - Ref Daddy
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 23, 2007, 06:13pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ref Daddy
A referee can call an "inadvertant whistle" and resume play.
Once you blow the inadvertant whistle though, the ball is dead, so he's entitled to a TO then.

EDIT: Entitled isn't really the word, but there's no reason now to not grant his request.

Last edited by WhistlesAndStripes; Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 06:25pm.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 23, 2007, 07:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 86
but if i did say it was an inadvertent whistle, I would still not let him have the time-out, and quickly put the ball back in play.. Not basing this on any rule, just probably what I'd do.
__________________
P.S. is what that part of the alphabet would look like if Q and R were eliminated from it.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:05am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1