Originally Posted by BayStateRef

We had a couple of lengthy "theoretical" discussion earlier this season (http://forum.officiating.com/showthread.php?t=30153 and http://forum.officiating.com/showthr...ht=unannounced) about the proper throw-in spot following a violation when the throw-in pass was caught out of bounds.

This was a reality in a Friday night boys varsity game. (I was not there, but saw a tape of the game on the local cable TV channel.) 1.6 seconds remaining. Home team is up by 1 point, with designated spot throw-in on visitor's end-line, near the corner. They run a play, where point guard breaks long and gets a pass on the other side of the division line. But the throw is poor, and ends up curling toward the sideline. A1 (the point guard) tries to catch the pass with his feet inbounds, but he doesn't. He has a foot on the line. The officials spent a lot of time deciding where to put the ball in play. They finally decided on the spot where the ball was caught, which is almost 50 feet from the basket.

Had the officials applied the penalty of 9-2 ("The ball is awarded to the opponents for a throw-in at the original throw-in spot.") it would have been a very different try for goal to win the game. (The long pass from half-court was deflected, so visitors never got a shot off.) I am always amazed at how many of these seemingly "obscure" rules references and discussions actually come up during the season.

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

I'd bet that a non-trivial majority of officials will not have even realized this was changed.

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Can there be a trivial majority? (Keep your political comments to yourself.)