The Official Forum
Page 3 of 3 12 3
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Foul on Shooter then PC (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/31057-foul-shooter-then-pc.html)

JRutledge Sun Jan 21, 2007 10:48am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
We basically agree, and I don't think that Juggling Referee's philosophy is really that much different either. I just didn't think that, either way, you could really make a blanket statement using "always" or "never".

It doesn't happen often, as you said. But I can see a very specific situation where the false double foul might be the right call.
For me I can say "always" or "never" in this situation. If others want to call this that is there right to do so. They do have the rulebook and casebook to back them up. I just think this is worst than calling a blarge because at least a blarge is an accident. In my opinion you basically have to insist on calling this and stick with a false double foul. Be my guest. ;)

Peace

Jurassic Referee Sun Jan 21, 2007 10:50am
Quote:
Originally Posted by sharkref
No, if he or she was knocked into the third row, then that would fall under flagrant and should be called but <font color = red>if A1 is fouled on the way up and the other contact is strictly momentum, I would only call the shooting foul.</font> I respect any other opinion and <font color = red>I would also say calling a false double foul would not be wrong either.</font>
Didn't you just say two completely <b>different</b> things here?:confused:

You're stating that calling a false double foul is wrong, but calling a false double foul isn't wrong.

Momentum really can't be a factor. Once he leaves his feet, the shooter's momentum isn't going to be altered that much. The <b>path</b> of his momentum might be altered though.

Jurassic Referee Sun Jan 21, 2007 10:51am
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge
For me I can say "always" or "never" in this situation. If others want to call this that is there right to do so. They do have the rulebook and casebook to back them up. I just think this is worst than calling a blarge because at least a blarge is an accident. In my opinion you basically have to insist on calling this and stick with a false double foul. Be my guest.
I was wrong. We don't agree then.

JRutledge Sun Jan 21, 2007 10:58am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
I was wrong. We don't agree then.
I can live with that. It is not going to change my position or my thoughts on this. ;)

Peace

Raymond Sun Jan 21, 2007 11:51am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
I was wrong. We don't agree then.
JRut and Jurassic disagreeing on something. Who would have thunk it? :p


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:20pm.
Page 3 of 3 12 3
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1