![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You're missing the point. You have absolutely <b>NO</b> rules justification to call a technical foul on a player who rattles the backboard while trying to make a legitimate block. It's legal for that player to hit it as hard as he can if he's going for the ball. All you are doing is making up your own rule again because you don't like the rule that we have(that is, if you actually knew the correct rule in the first place....which I kinda doubt). If you have an evaluator at one of your college games, you will never get away with trying to bullsh!t him on that one. Never! You'll never get away with that in higher level varsity games either, where the kids play above the rim. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Famous quote:
(paraphrased) An official must be careful not to, in his own mind, become bigger than the game that he is there to officiate.
.....or something like that. For some reason this came to mind. Or, in laymen terms: I'm running this game. If the rules are kinda parallel to the way I run it, good. If not, they (everyone else, coaches, players, even partners) will adapt. |
The rules and supporting case information are crystal clear. Slapping of the backboard by a defender as part of a legitimate block attempt is not a T.
Running around making up interpretations contrary to the rules, based on what you think might or might not happen, is wrong, and IMHO, unprofessional. How can we expect the participants to conform to the rules if we ourselves choose selectively not to? Some example that sets...... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:46am. |