Reestablishing feet or only a foot??
 

I believe I read on here once that if a player is out of bounds then they are able to touch the ball again as long as they have one foot back in bounds and the other foot no longer touching out of bounds. Is this correct?

ex: A1 misses a layup and his/her momentum takes him/her OOB. The rebound is batted right back towards A1. At the moment the ball is batted, A1 is standing one foot in bounds, one foot out of bounds. A1 may legally touch the ball after doing what?

...lifting the foot that is currently out of bounds into the air; or sliding that same foot into the inbounds area so that it is no longer touching the court OOB.

Fundamental is you either inbounds or your out of bounds.

If nothing is out then you are in.
If anything is out you are out.

Yep, yep. --------

Teddy Riley in the house. :D

Peace

_______________________
Nevada, that has to be the shortest post of your life!;)

Actually, at first it was rejected for being too short, so I had to add the line (-----). :D

And I have yet to figure out the secret behind how Dan does this:


:(

Me Too.<i></i>

Hmmm
<b> </b>

Do you know what is both the shortest full sentence <b>and</b> also the longest full sentence at the same time?

(Now playing the role of Ed McMahon - M&M Guy.)

No, JR, I don't know.

What is both the shortest full sentence <b>and</b> also the longest full sentence at the same time?

"I am."

That's my best guess off the top of my head.

Yes.
&nbsp;

I think I do know the answer to this one.

Short phrase to respond
 

When asked for an explanation, it's best to respond
with a simple phrase.
My choice is: "OK IF SOMETHING IN & NOTHING OUT"

Bad News got it. <b>"I do."</b>

BadNews is wise beyond his years. He must be a Yankees fan.

Wise? :)

Yankee fan? :mad:

I'm known around here as being a Yankee fan antogonizer. My best friend is from the Bronx. I'm always quick to challenge the manliness of the left side of her infield. :D

Jeter? Or the goof we're trying to get rid off?

<!--dummy text-->?

<I see how you do it> OK

Now why could I see how Camron does it by clicking on quote, but not Dan, JR, or mbyron?

Some of this stuff just doesn't make sense to me.

I think that the interpolation of 'full' - twice! - sorta kills the joke.

JR sure gives good officiating advice, though....