Quote:
Originally posted by Rich Fronheiser
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
Personally, I didn't care for Tennessee being seeded as a #2. yes, I would like to have seen Carolina seeded #2 and be placed in Greensboro for the first two games. But I'm not unhappy with the #3 seed. I just feel that #2 should be better than #3 and they're not.
LSU at a #4 is strange as well. Michigan State is the strongest #6, perhaps ever, in the tournament.
|
They didn't play each other, so how do you know?
Lunardi had Tennessee as a #5. This is clearly his worst year ever.
|
I believe that is the committee, and not Lunardi, who had a bad year. His job is to make predictions based on a reasonable tournament selection process; I don't think this year's version fits the bill.
----------------
Tony,
I share your sentiments totally, though I can't say that I'm disappointed that our guys won't have to share the Coliseum with you and your bretheren
I haven't really looked closely yet, but wouldn't everything have been okay had the committee flipped UNC and UT? There wouldn't be nearly so many questions about UNC being a 2 as there are with UT being a 2.
[Edited by jbduke on Mar 13th, 2006 at 12:03 AM]
Sun Mar 12, 2006, 11:57pm
Threaded Mode
