Anyone notice the cover of the latest issue of That Magazine That Shall Not Be Named?

A basketball official is speaking with a player and is grasping the player's arm just above the elbow.

I'm sure it was innocuous and we don't know the context, but the first thing that went through my mind was "DON'T TOUCH A PLAYER!"

Anyone else get that thought?

I didn't see it. I guess I don't know the secret code for magazines.

Maybe the official and the player were talking about doing lunch later.

So are you a Rumpole fan?!?

He's talking about referee magazine, not so sure why he didn't just say the name of the magazine but whatever.

http://www.referee.com/BackIssues/images/0106.jpg

Sorry, I did that once and the topic got binned by a mod and it was explained to me that there was some brouhaha between this site and the magazine a few years back.

So are you a Rumpole reader, or not?

Never, ever touch a player.

Ever.

There was a lawsuit (or threat of a suit). This site once had a different name....eReferee.com, IIRC. The magazine claimed they had owned the term "Referee". I don't know if a court decision confirmed that or if the site just chose to change their name to avoid the expense.

What he said. Ever.

----------------------------------------------------------

Come on guys (and ladies)look at the cover again. Didn't you read the article title on the kid's back - "Do You Have What it Takes to be a Lead?" They're dancing! And the kid in the background is about to cut in!

You don't shake hands with the captains before the game? :)

In all seriousness, I just don't agree with that. I know we're all concerned about liability or whatever. If two kids are on the ground after a held ball, I offer a hand to each of them. If a kid shows good hustle or good sportsmanship, I'll make a comment and give a pat on the back. If two kids have squared off in a stare-down, I get right between them with a hand on each chest.

I don't see anything wrong with any of these. I know there's always a concern with what someone might say or think. But I'm not so concerned about it that I can't even touch another person.

To add to the above reply, for all we know the player had previously grabbed the official's arm, and he was removing it. If the message of the article is that physical contact is necessary to "take the lead" then it's misleading, but there are plenty of situations where it's acceptable to touch a player, as long as you keep it to a bare minimum.

Me too.

I think the official in the picture is checking the pupils of the kid's eyes. I'd like to check the pupils of some of the coaches to see if they are on something.

As I recall it was agreed by the parties or mandated by the court that eReferee.com was too similar to the trademarked Referee because they competed in the same market.

Kinda like if you opened a fast food franchise & called it eMcDonald's.

Even in a girl's game? :eek:

Other than that, I agree with you. Some, very limited contact is ok.

Now I'm goin' to eMcDonalds to get a virtual eMcMuffin.

Go online, they'll email it to you.

In the picture it seems the referee is almost trying to restrain the guy or something, I don't like that.

I'm always up for the nice hand shake or occasional pat on the back or help up from the floor. I don't think I'd do as the picture shows though.

Don't you have to go to the closest bench first to get a chair to stand on so you can do that?

Nah, it wouldn't be enough!! He needs the step ladder from the Janitor's closet.

So that's why the missus made you stop working girls' games!

OverAndBack,

You can say "Referee Magazine." We talk about that magazine all the time here or reference an article or two. This place is for officiating, not just talking about what goes on the paid site.

Peace

I am. My guess is that you didn't get a response out of OAB because he didn't know what a Rumpole is.

Question, Juulie: Could a shared appreciation of Rumpole be the primary explanation for why we share political sensibilities? I'm going to ruminate on this one for a while;)

Maybe. I'm actually not much of Rumpole fan. Believe it or not, the humor is too dry for me. I've read enough to sound literate, but it's a ruse.

I didn't know you and I shared political sensibilities. Nice to know I'm not the only dyed-in-the-wool bleeding-heart-liberal around. It gets kinda loney out here on this particular branch.

Fixed your tpyo.

Samuel Johnson had it right.

Even in a Girl's game?

VHSL
 

Did anyone notice that its a Virginia Official?

Re: VHSL
 

Oh, that's what it is.

Virginia is for Lovers.







Not that there's anything wrong with that.





For the record, no, I don't know what Rumpole is, and I won't shy away from references to Referee Magazine anymore. JRutledge, helpful as always. :)

Re: VHSL
 

You must have looked at the actual magzine. There's no way you could tell it is VA from that small photo.

Re: Re: VHSL
 

I noticed the patch on his shirt. I do get those magazines too.

Re: Re: Re: VHSL
 

I noticed the patch also, but could not tell -- even after you pointed it out. Guess that is the difference between my "old" eyes and your "young" ones.

They stop serving ebreakfast at 10:30. You are too late.

Ahh, that's the beauty of the internet - it's still before 10:30 somewhere...

I'm gonna go check my e-mail for delivery.