The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #28 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 10, 2005, 06:22am
Fav theme: Roundball Rock
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Near Dog River (sorta)
Posts: 8,558
The rule that covers this situation, I believe, is 2-3.

A couple of Federation penalty fundamentals:
  • where possible, all aspects of the penalty are applied

  • penalize in the order of occurance

  • POI does not yet officially exist

  • "cancelling-out" FTs exists on simultaneous fouls and could include not awarding a team FTs even if they're in the bonus


  • B's foul gives A (i) a possible 1+1 with a rebound, or (ii) possession. A's foul gives B 2+possession.

    If B's foul is a non-bonus foul, then I can see giving B 2 shots for the T (bullet 1) and then going with the arrow to determine possession. If B's foul is a bonus foul, I can see cancelling the FTs (bullet 4), and give B possession (bullet 1).

    The difference between these two is that FTs and possession are dependant on the number of team fouls against one team. I don't like this. Therefore, I think the above logic is not sufficient.

    This year: no shots, possession using arrow.

    Next year: no shots, possession using POI.

    [Edited by JugglingReferee on May 10th, 2005 at 07:24 AM]
    __________________
    Pope Francis
    Reply With Quote
     

    Bookmarks


    Posting Rules
    You may not post new threads
    You may not post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is On
    Trackbacks are On
    Pingbacks are On
    Refbacks are On



    All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:04pm.



    Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1