The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Myth-buster NBA game (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/19565-myth-buster-nba-game.html)

Back In The Saddle Wed Apr 06, 2005 02:13am

I went with my daughter to an NBA game tonight. It's only the second or third NBA game I've ever gone to. The game wasn't great, but the officiating was very impressive. In stark contrast to many of the stereotypes that persist about the way the NBA game is officiated I noticed the following:
  • Several traveling calls
  • A few three seconds calls, one of which was a defensive one
  • A couple of real jump balls
  • Several offensive fouls called most of which were not run-overs
  • A 20 second time-out to tie a shoe
  • A couple of technicals, obviously for things players said
  • A palming call
  • On a foul in the last two minutes, the officials conferred and determined that it was an away-from-the-ball foul
  • A delay of game warning for not tossing the ball to the nearest official
  • They called the game much more tightly than I normally call mens games. Maybe I need to reevaluate my game.
  • An official working sans lanyard changed his mind on a foul call while putting the whistle into his mouth. He had his arm/fist in the air, but in the time it took to get the whistle into his mouth, the fouled player came away with the advantage and the official quickly pulled his arm back down. A good no-call IMHO
  • With NBA reporting mechanics, it's sometimes difficult to tell who called the foul. Their signals are very demonstrative. And they appear to sometimes communicate more information that we do in HS. Case in point, after the second T, the official had to signal what happened to the table several times (perhaps the scorekeeper was on his third beer by then?). Each time he made the T signal, followed by the players number, and then there was a second number that I couldn't figure out. It wasn't the number of shots. Dunno.

I was very impressed with their performance, I'm not saying that I'm qualified to be their judge, just that I was impressed.

I have a couple of questions I'm sure somebody will know the answer to. 1) How does the switching work in NBA mechanics? 2) What are the hash marks on the floor around 28' for?

[Edited by Back In The Saddle on Apr 6th, 2005 at 04:36 AM]

Mark Padgett Wed Apr 06, 2005 11:16am

Quote:

Originally posted by Back In The Saddle
What are the hash marks on the floor around 28' for?

To inform the players the current street price of hash. Right now, it's $28.00. The marks move as the price changes.

At least, that's what they mean here in Portland.

tomegun Wed Apr 06, 2005 11:21am

In the NBA when they call a foul they

go to a position they weren't previously at

and

the calling official goes to the table if it is a shooting foul

and

they take the ball out on the sides for non-shooting fouls and violations

ChuckElias Wed Apr 06, 2005 12:33pm

Quote:

Originally posted by tomegun
In the NBA when they call a foul they

go to a position they weren't previously at

and

the calling official goes to the table if it is a shooting foul

This is a little vague. In the NBA, the calling official always moves to (or stays in) the Trail position. The other two officials move to new positions. So if the Trail opposite the table calls a non-shooting foul that will be inbounded on his/her sideline, the calling official stays put and the Lead and Slot officials switch.

If the Trail opposite the table calls a shooting foul, then the calling official moves to the table-side and becomes the Trail. The old table-side Slot moves to the Lead and the old Lead moves to be the new Slot opposite the table.

Quote:

they take the ball out on the sides for non-shooting fouls and violations
Except for OOB violations on the endline; or an Away-from-the-play foul before the ball is inbounded from the endline. In those cases (and probably some others), the ball is put back in play on the endline.

ChuckElias Wed Apr 06, 2005 12:47pm

Quote:

Originally posted by ChuckElias
In the NBA, the calling official always moves to (or stays in) the Trail position.
Sorry. Should've said this applies to fouls called in the frontcourt.

"Always" always gets me in trouble. :)

brainbrian Wed Apr 06, 2005 04:32pm

I've been watching more bits and pieces of NBA games on TV here. In the bit I've been watching I've been noticing that I see more things called as well. I think there has been some others that shocked me as well.

I've seen
1. Traveling on Shaq
2. Defensive 3-seconds
3. Offensive 3-seconds

tomegun Wed Apr 06, 2005 07:44pm

Yeah Chuck I was very vague. I have found it easier to just say you need to be in a different position and either do it or watch it after that.

tjones1 Wed Apr 06, 2005 09:13pm

I haven't watched a full NBA game in a long time. I can only watch about 5 minutes then I get bored and change channels.

proref27 Fri Apr 15, 2005 12:08pm

NBA mechanics are the best mechanics in basketball! From NFHS to NCAA they are definitley the best. Women's NCAA is close to the NBA...the major difference being dead ball mechanics. All the people who bad mouth them out there are those who have never used them or learned why they do what they do. It makes no sense for a Lead or Trail to go all the way to the table on non shooting fouls to report. Also, why to you have to use a foul on the arm signal when reporting if the guy got smacked upside his head. Not believable. In pro mechanics you can show what the foul was. Also their new on court mechanics and rotations are much better. The officials are on the floor more dictating the angles on plays...NBA officials are taught to never be "squared up" with a sideline or baseline. They stress "slot with a trail mentality". As soon as the ball settles or pauses on either side the lead has to rotate. Slot can rotate topside before the lead comes over or completes a rotation. They always have two officials on ball side/strong side.

PS2Man Mon Apr 18, 2005 04:25am

Proref,

That is all a matter of opinion. Pro ball is different because it is pro ball. No amateur level does the same things as the pros nor should they.

proref27 Mon Apr 18, 2005 07:54am

Quote:

Originally posted by PS2Man
Proref,

That is all a matter of opinion. Pro ball is different because it is pro ball. No amateur level does the same things as the pros nor should they.


PS2Man,

Well, the SEC preaches NBA mechanics in their system, and the guys that I know love it. That's one level of amateur basketball it has worked well. The NBA is also actively pursuing better relationships with other conferences to incorporate their mechanics......specifically the ACC. Remember the NBA created the 3 person system and also puts more time and money into developing it and making it better than anyone else. For instance, I have found that being in better position and more onto the floor in the slot/c and trail positions...getting "topside of the plays" and always refereeing form the "outside in" whenever possible has given me better "open angles" and ability to see plays on every level I work.

ChuckElias Mon Apr 18, 2005 12:10pm

Quote:

Originally posted by proref27
It makes no sense for a Lead or Trail to go all the way to the table on non shooting fouls to report.
It makes a whole lot of sense if you're reporting to young, inexperienced adolescents who might not even be paying enough attention to know which official blew the whistle. The point of going to a "reporting box" is visibility to the table personnel. That's not as big a problem in the NBA b/c you have very professional table personnel. But at the HS and lower NCAA levels, it's better to go to the reporting area and be sure that the table knows who the foul is on. JMO (and I've used both sets of mechanics).

Quote:

Also, why to you have to use a foul on the arm signal when reporting if the guy got smacked upside his head.

Because the foul is not "smacking upside the head". The foul is "illegal use of hands". Simple as that. And since you're tableside after reporting the foul, if the coach says "Where did he get him?", you can tell him. Not a big deal.

Quote:

The officials are on the floor more dictating the angles on plays...

You make it sound like HS and NCAA officials are told to stay in one spot and officate from there (which used to be the NBA philosophy in the '70s, I'm pretty sure). NCAA and HS officials also move to get the best angle on plays. There are a still a lot of guys and gals who get stuck on the sideline while in the C position. But I think that is changing.

Quote:

NBA officials are taught to never be "squared up" with a sideline or baseline.

Never? I was at Ronnie Nunn's Orlando camp last summer and I don't remember that being taught.

Quote:

They stress "slot with a trail mentality".

This is a great philosophy that Ronnie introduced. I don't think it means never be square to the sideline, but as the play moves to the basket, instead of simply sliding down the sideline, take a step onto the court and get a "Trail's look" at the play. I will agree that this should be adopted in HS and NCAA more than it is now.

Quote:

They always have two officials on ball side/strong side.
NCAA and HS try to do this as well. But most NCAA instructors don't like the ping-pong-ball effect of the Lead moving across the lane every time the ball swings.

Something that you don't talk about is floor coverages, which I personally feel are better in the NCAA men's system. I don't like having to officiate all the way to the sideline while in the Lead position. Additionally, in NBA coverage, if the ball is in the post on the Lead's side and is passed out to the corner, the Lead shifts his/her view from the post to the corner while the Trail shifts his/her view from the corner to the post, which is right in front of the Lead.

So we have two officials shifting their coverage when in NCAA, nobody has to shift. The Lead simply stays with the post activity (waiting for another entry pass), while the Trail (who already had responsibility outside the arc) picks up on-ball coverage. This makes a ton of sense to me.

I know NBA refs and NCAA women refs swear by their coverage scheme, but I don't like it. Again, JMO.

PS2Man Mon Apr 18, 2005 12:26pm

Quote:

Originally posted by proref27
PS2Man,

Well, the SEC preaches NBA mechanics in their system, and the guys that I know love it. That's one level of amateur basketball it has worked well. The NBA is also actively pursuing better relationships with other conferences to incorporate their mechanics......specifically the ACC. Remember the NBA created the 3 person system and also puts more time and money into developing it and making it better than anyone else. For instance, I have found that being in better position and more onto the floor in the slot/c and trail positions...getting "topside of the plays" and always refereeing form the "outside in" whenever possible has given me better "open angles" and ability to see plays on every level I work.


This is still your opinion. I have seen the NBA change to things or philosophies that were done at the college ranks in recent years. Philosophies like rotating from the lead position. The NBA officials move much more from the lead position then they have in many years. They used to get fixed in a position and hardly move regardless of where the ball would go.

I think Chuck illustrated point by point what I feel NBA mechanics as well. I think the main reason for the NBA to have the mechanics they do is because everyone is trained very well to know what the other people are doing. I do not see that as the case at the high school level or the lower level college levels.

Back In The Saddle Mon Apr 18, 2005 04:38pm

Quote:

Originally posted by ChuckElias

Quote:

They stress "slot with a trail mentality".

This is a great philosophy that Ronnie introduced. I don't think it means never be square to the sideline, but as the play moves to the basket, instead of simply sliding down the sideline, take a step onto the court and get a "Trail's look" at the play. I will agree that this should be adopted in HS and NCAA more than it is now.

This is the first time I've heard this phrase "slot with a trail mentality." Does it mean only what you've said here (i.e., step onto the court on the shot)? Or is there more to this philosophy that you would't mind expounding on?

proref27 Tue Apr 19, 2005 08:47am


[/B][/QUOTE]This is the first time I've heard this phrase "slot with a trail mentality." Does it mean only what you've said here (i.e., step onto the court on the shot)? Or is there more to this philosophy that you would't mind expounding on? [/B][/QUOTE]


Back In The Saddle,

No this does not mean only when a shot goes up. This means everytime the ball comes to the slot side and pauses or settles that the slot gets out over the top of the play. Another instance would be to see high post play. The slot can be as high as top of the circle if needed. There are still times when the slot can drop down, such as swing of the ball and quick 3pt shot or to referee action areas off ball in the lane. However, anytime the ball pauses or settles you shouldn't go low and referee from the inside out, but rather from the outside in, topside of the play. This of course also applies to drives to the basket and helping out on weakside rebounding. Once you get comfortable with it, it really changes how you see the floor. Basically it's saying to get out on the floor just like when we still had the two man game and referee instead of being cemented to the sidline.

This is probably hard to understand without actually seeing it. I wish I had access to the computer program the NBA uses to teach this, it really illustrates it very well.

proref27 Tue Apr 19, 2005 08:50am

Quote:

Originally posted by PS2Man
Quote:

Originally posted by proref27
PS2Man,

Well, the SEC preaches NBA mechanics in their system, and the guys that I know love it. That's one level of amateur basketball it has worked well. The NBA is also actively pursuing better relationships with other conferences to incorporate their mechanics......specifically the ACC. Remember the NBA created the 3 person system and also puts more time and money into developing it and making it better than anyone else. For instance, I have found that being in better position and more onto the floor in the slot/c and trail positions...getting "topside of the plays" and always refereeing form the "outside in" whenever possible has given me better "open angles" and ability to see plays on every level I work.


This is still your opinion. I have seen the NBA change to things or philosophies that were done at the college ranks in recent years. Philosophies like rotating from the lead position. The NBA officials move much more from the lead position then they have in many years. They used to get fixed in a position and hardly move regardless of where the ball would go.

I think Chuck illustrated point by point what I feel NBA mechanics as well. I think the main reason for the NBA to have the mechanics they do is because everyone is trained very well to know what the other people are doing. I do not see that as the case at the high school level or the lower level college levels.

The NBA has used accelerated Lead philosophy since at least the mid 90's. Yes, when everyone is on the same page it is a thing of beauty. Obviously that's easier to do when you only have to worry about 60 officials.

proref27 Tue Apr 19, 2005 09:17am

Quote:

Originally posted by ChuckElias
Quote:

Originally posted by proref27
It makes no sense for a Lead or Trail to go all the way to the table on non shooting fouls to report.
It makes a whole lot of sense if you're reporting to young, inexperienced adolescents who might not even be paying enough attention to know which official blew the whistle. The point of going to a "reporting box" is visibility to the table personnel. That's not as big a problem in the NBA b/c you have very professional table personnel. But at the HS and lower NCAA levels, it's better to go to the reporting area and be sure that the table knows who the foul is on. JMO (and I've used both sets of mechanics).

Well, they don't require you to go to the reporting box in the NCAA like they do HS. In NCAA you just have to clear the players. I can be just as clear to the table from either 28ft mark. I've used both sets of mechanics as well.

Quote:

Also, why to you have to use a foul on the arm signal when reporting if the guy got smacked upside his head.

Because the foul is not "smacking upside the head". The foul is "illegal use of hands". Simple as that. And since you're tableside after reporting the foul, if the coach says "Where did he get him?", you can tell him. Not a big deal.

Or I could just say "#25 hit on the head" while demonstrating, and then there will be no reason for the coach to ask. Seems more efficient to me.

Quote:

The officials are on the floor more dictating the angles on plays...

You make it sound like HS and NCAA officials are told to stay in one spot and officate from there (which used to be the NBA philosophy in the '70s, I'm pretty sure). NCAA and HS officials also move to get the best angle on plays. There are a still a lot of guys and gals who get stuck on the sideline while in the C position. But I think that is changing.

--Like anything else, it is changing slowly. It all trickles down from the top.

Quote:

NBA officials are taught to never be "squared up" with a sideline or baseline.

Never? I was at Ronnie Nunn's Orlando camp last summer and I don't remember that being taught.

--Didn't think he had been able to do his Nunn better camps for a couple of years now since he was the Supervisor. Also things have changed even more from just a couple of years ago. A week in an class taught by the NBA including a couple by Ronnie, was pretty clear...keep your body at an angle.

Quote:

They stress "slot with a trail mentality".

This is a great philosophy that Ronnie introduced. I don't think it means never be square to the sideline, but as the play moves to the basket, instead of simply sliding down the sideline, take a step onto the court and get a "Trail's look" at the play. I will agree that this should be adopted in HS and NCAA more than it is now.

--This is most certainly not "only on plays that move to the basket." Anytime the ball settles or pauses the slot is supposed to get topside, which often leads to him becoming the new Trail when the Lead rotates. Another instance is when you have high post play opposite lane line, and to help on both strong/weakside rebounding. There are still instances when you can drop down to referee action areas off ball, but when the ball comes over you shoulden't be low unless it's a quick shot or pass.

Quote:

They always have two officials on ball side/strong side.
NCAA and HS try to do this as well. But most NCAA instructors don't like the ping-pong-ball effect of the Lead moving across the lane every time the ball swings.

-- And a lot more are just lazy and leave the slot with way to much to referee. Far too many...especially high school to not rotate fast enough. I see it so many times the ball in the opposite corner and the lead not even thinking "pinching the paint" much less rotating.

Something that you don't talk about is floor coverages, which I personally feel are better in the NCAA men's system. I don't like having to officiate all the way to the sideline while in the Lead position. Additionally, in NBA coverage, if the ball is in the post on the Lead's side and is passed out to the corner, the Lead shifts his/her view from the post to the corner while the Trail shifts his/her view from the corner to the post, which is right in front of the Lead.

NBA/women's NCAA coverage is easier, and I work men's ball. It is much easier for the Lead to see plays in the corner outside the 3pt line than the Trail. As the Lead your only having to pick up say an extra 2-3 ft below the bottom tip of circle (NBA) or FT line ext (Women's). In Men's and HS the trail has to see an extra 15 ft. Again, those plays in the deep corner are real tough for a Trail. I think it just makes more sense to have official closest to the play and with a better look referee the play, but that's just me I guess.

So we have two officials shifting their coverage when in NCAA, nobody has to shift. The Lead simply stays with the post activity (waiting for another entry pass), while the Trail (who already had responsibility outside the arc) picks up on-ball coverage. This makes a ton of sense to me.

I know NBA refs and NCAA women refs swear by their coverage scheme, but I don't like it. Again, JMO.


ChuckElias Tue Apr 19, 2005 12:16pm

Quote:

Originally posted by proref27
Well, they don't require you to go to the reporting box in the NCAA like they do HS. In NCAA you just have to clear the players. I can be just as clear to the table from either 28ft mark. I've used both sets of mechanics as well.

"Clearing the players" is used (or is supposed to be used) for fouls in the backcourt. I think that in the frontcourt, they still want us to hustle to the reporting area and STOP to report. Bob will correct me if I've got that wrong.

Quote:

Or I could just say "#25 hit on the head" while demonstrating, and then there will be no reason for the coach to ask. Seems more efficient to me.
Maybe, but as you yourself pointed out, the NCAA has a lot more officials to worry about than the NBA. And b/c of that, the NCAA wants its officials to be as standardized as possible. The easiest way to do that is to say that for any foul involving use of hands, use this signal. Then, since you're tableside, if there's a question, you can handle it. They simply want uniformity if possible. So we don't have guys hitting themselves on one side of the head, or the other, or on top, or in the face. . . Eventually, it just starts looking silly.

Quote:

Didn't think he had been able to do his Nunn better camps for a couple of years now since he was the Supervisor. Also things have changed even more from just a couple of years ago. A week in an class taught by the NBA including a couple by Ronnie, was pretty clear...keep your body at an angle.

It was Nunn Better in '03, but changed for '04. Phil Robinson technically ran the camp, but it was still pretty clearly Ronnie's camp. I was there in July '04 and I promise you that nobody said "never be square to the sideline".

Quote:

This ["trail mentality"] is most certainly not "only on plays that move to the basket."

I don't think I ever said it was. . . :confused:

Quote:

And a lot more are just lazy and leave the slot with way to much to referee.

Frankly, this comment is pretty insulting. I work with a lot of different guys, and I work with very few "lazy" officials. I could count them on one hand in seven years. I don't think that's a fair comment. It sounds more like a bias against anything NCAA in preference for anything NBA.

Quote:

Far too many...especially high school to not rotate fast enough. I see it so many times the ball in the opposite corner and the lead not even thinking "pinching the paint" much less rotating.

I agree wholeheartely with this. But this is a far cry from being lazy. It is more a result of two things:

1) Different philosophy among supervisors. As I said earlier, many NCAA supervisors don't like to see their Lead officials bouncing back and forth. So the officials are told not to rotate as much as the NBA guys; and

2) Lack of training at the HS level. Many HS guys just don't do a whole lot of 3-whistle games. Some states, like NC, use it for all HS games, and that's great. But it's hardly the standard.

I think you need to cut a little slack for these guys.

Quote:

It is much easier for the Lead to see plays in the corner outside the 3pt line than the Trail.
That is obviously a matter of opinion, and I happen to disagree with you as much as I possibly could. I think it's about 1,000 times easier for the Trail to pick up that corner. JMO, you obviously disagree.

proref27 Tue Apr 19, 2005 01:00pm

Quote:

Originally posted by ChuckElias
Quote:

Originally posted by proref27
Well, they don't require you to go to the reporting box in the NCAA like they do HS. In NCAA you just have to clear the players. I can be just as clear to the table from either 28ft mark. I've used both sets of mechanics as well.

"Clearing the players" is used (or is supposed to be used) for fouls in the backcourt. I think that in the frontcourt, they still want us to hustle to the reporting area and STOP to report. Bob will correct me if I've got that wrong.

Quote:

Or I could just say "#25 hit on the head" while demonstrating, and then there will be no reason for the coach to ask. Seems more efficient to me.
Maybe, but as you yourself pointed out, the NCAA has a lot more officials to worry about than the NBA. And b/c of that, the NCAA wants its officials to be as standardized as possible. The easiest way to do that is to say that for any foul involving use of hands, use this signal. Then, since you're tableside, if there's a question, you can handle it. They simply want uniformity if possible. So we don't have guys hitting themselves on one side of the head, or the other, or on top, or in the face. . . Eventually, it just starts looking silly.

Quote:

Didn't think he had been able to do his Nunn better camps for a couple of years now since he was the Supervisor. Also things have changed even more from just a couple of years ago. A week in an class taught by the NBA including a couple by Ronnie, was pretty clear...keep your body at an angle.

It was Nunn Better in '03, but changed for '04. Phil Robinson technically ran the camp, but it was still pretty clearly Ronnie's camp. I was there in July '04 and I promise you that nobody said "never be square to the sideline".

Quote:

This ["trail mentality"] is most certainly not "only on plays that move to the basket."

I don't think I ever said it was. . . :confused:

Quote:

And a lot more are just lazy and leave the slot with way to much to referee.

Frankly, this comment is pretty insulting. I work with a lot of different guys, and I work with very few "lazy" officials. I could count them on one hand in seven years. I don't think that's a fair comment. It sounds more like a bias against anything NCAA in preference for anything NBA.

--You are right here, it is unfair to say lazy, it is a case of less educated and experienced. Either way they leave the slot/c hanging. I don't have a bias against anything NCAA, but I do feel the NBA has the best mechanics in basketball, and if you were to ask Mr. Nunn he would probably say the same thing. In fact I heard him say it. But again, what else would the Supervisor of Officials think.

Quote:

Far too many...especially high school to not rotate fast enough. I see it so many times the ball in the opposite corner and the lead not even thinking "pinching the paint" much less rotating.

I agree wholeheartedly with this. But this is a far cry from being lazy. It is more a result of two things:

1) Different philosophy among supervisors. As I said earlier, many NCAA supervisors don't like to see their Lead officials bouncing back and forth. So the officials are told not to rotate as much as the NBA guys; and

2) Lack of training at the HS level. Many HS guys just don't do a whole lot of 3-whistle games. Some states, like NC, use it for all HS games, and that's great. But it's hardly the standard.

I think you need to cut a little slack for these guys.

--I agree, but far too many are not willing to accept or learn from a new philosophy when they know it comes from the NBA. I think this is why the NBA is really starting to make an effort to reach out with more NCAA conferences hoping they can get more people on the same page. You have to wonder at what point will the NCAA or CCA step in and say "stop going behind are backs and telling are conferences and officials to change!" Although even the CCA mechanics and NCAA disagree sometimes. For instance, the NCAA rule book says it's permissible for an official to not give the stop the clock signal on out of bounds calls and to just signal direction. The CCA manual specifically forbids this however.


Quote:

It is much easier for the Lead to see plays in the corner outside the 3pt line than the Trail.
That is obviously a matter of opinion, and I happen to disagree with you as much as I possibly could. I think it's about 1,000 times easier for the Trail to pick up that corner. JMO, you obviously disagree.

Maybe I am biased, but I just prefer a lot of the pro mechanics and coverage. At least I have had the experience to have an opinion one way or the other, and it sounds like you have too. At least you understand why they do what they do and believe it works on their level.

Jurassic Referee Tue Apr 19, 2005 02:18pm

Quote:

Originally posted by proref27

At least I have had the experience to have an opinion one way or the other, and it sounds like you have too. At least you understand why they do what they do and believe it works on their level. [/B]
Exactly what experience in the pro game do you have? Iow, what pro leagues do you work in?

Just wondering.

gsf23 Tue Apr 19, 2005 02:52pm

Quote:

Originally posted by Back In The Saddle
2) What are the hash marks on the floor around 28' for?

[Edited by Back In The Saddle on Apr 6th, 2005 at 04:36 AM] [/B]
I believe they are supposed to mark the boundry for the coaches box.

NBA Rule 3 Section IV
a. The coach's position may be on or off the bench from the 28' hash mark to the baseline. They are permitted between the 28' hash mark and the midcourt line to relay information to players but must return to the bench side of the 28' hash mark immediately or be called for an non-unsportsmanlike technical foul. A coach is not permitted to cross the midcourt line and violators will be assessed an unsportsmanlike technical foul immediately. All assistants and trainers must remain on the bench. Coaches and trainers are not permitted to go to the scorer's table, for any reason, except during a deadball.

Back In The Saddle Tue Apr 19, 2005 11:11pm

Quote:

Originally posted by gsf23
Quote:

Originally posted by Back In The Saddle
2) What are the hash marks on the floor around 28' for?

[Edited by Back In The Saddle on Apr 6th, 2005 at 04:36 AM]
I believe they are supposed to mark the boundry for the coaches box.

NBA Rule 3 Section IV
a. The coach's position may be on or off the bench from the 28' hash mark to the baseline. They are permitted between the 28' hash mark and the midcourt line to relay information to players but must return to the bench side of the 28' hash mark immediately or be called for an non-unsportsmanlike technical foul. A coach is not permitted to cross the midcourt line and violators will be assessed an unsportsmanlike technical foul immediately. All assistants and trainers must remain on the bench. Coaches and trainers are not permitted to go to the scorer's table, for any reason, except during a deadball.
[/B]
Thank you. Now what are the 28' marks on the opposite side for? :) I may be completely wrong (yet again), but it seems to me that if you're going to require marks for a coaches box, they'd only be required on the table side. The rules also allow you a team to throw-in from the 28' marks after a timeout in certain circumstances. I get the feeling the marks were originally there for another purpose, but have remained because they're still used for coaches boxes. I believe the throw-in rule is new. It used to be half-court I've been told. Am I crazy?

proref27 Wed Apr 20, 2005 06:55am

Quote:

Originally posted by Back In The Saddle
Quote:

Originally posted by gsf23
Quote:

Originally posted by Back In The Saddle
2) What are the hash marks on the floor around 28' for?

[Edited by Back In The Saddle on Apr 6th, 2005 at 04:36 AM]
I believe they are supposed to mark the boundry for the coaches box.

NBA Rule 3 Section IV
a. The coach's position may be on or off the bench from the 28' hash mark to the baseline. They are permitted between the 28' hash mark and the midcourt line to relay information to players but must return to the bench side of the 28' hash mark immediately or be called for an non-unsportsmanlike technical foul. A coach is not permitted to cross the midcourt line and violators will be assessed an unsportsmanlike technical foul immediately. All assistants and trainers must remain on the bench. Coaches and trainers are not permitted to go to the scorer's table, for any reason, except during a deadball.
Thank you. Now what are the 28' marks on the opposite side for? :) I may be completely wrong (yet again), but it seems to me that if you're going to require marks for a coaches box, they'd only be required on the table side. The rules also allow you a team to throw-in from the 28' marks after a timeout in certain circumstances. I get the feeling the marks were originally there for another purpose, but have remained because they're still used for coaches boxes. I believe the throw-in rule is new. It used to be half-court I've been told. Am I crazy? [/B]
I've always assumed it was for throw-in's and general reference. They also have small hash marks that designate the FT line extended on the sidelines. I assume this is for throw-in's as well.

ChuckElias Wed Apr 20, 2005 04:03pm

Quote:

Originally posted by proref27
You are right here, it is unfair to say lazy, it is a case of less educated and experienced.

I wouldn't say they are less educated; I would say that they are differently educated. As I keep saying, NCAA officials are often told by their supervisors that they don't want to see the Lead rotate as much as the NBA guys. They are being trained and educated a lot and very well; but simply (and intentionally) using a different philosophy from the NBA mechanics.

Quote:

far too many are not willing to accept or learn from a new philosophy when they know it comes from the NBA.
Again, I agree with this. I think that (for better or worse), the NCAA is very slow to adopt anything that has an obvious NBA stamp on it.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:46am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1