refnrev Don't the upcoming year's rule changes come out about this time of year. Anyone know when they will be released by the NFHS? I didn't see anything on their website.
bob jenkins The basketball rules committee meets on April 18. Last year's changes were announce April 28.
JugglingReferee I recall that twice in the past 6 years that I first heard of the new Fed rules in early May.
Back In The Saddle I predict no gray shirts or shot clock. I hope they make the "playing oob" a violation instead of a technical foul. I hope they add some clarification to the term path and to closely guarded.
BktBallRef Originally posted by Back In The Saddle I hope they make the "playing oob" a violation instead of a technical foul. Say what?
Almost Always Right Originally posted by BktBallRef Originally posted by Back In The Saddle I hope they make the "playing oob" a violation instead of a technical foul. Say what? ^ What he said.
Snake~eyes Originally posted by BktBallRef Originally posted by Back In The Saddle I hope they make the "playing oob" a violation instead of a technical foul. Say what? He must of called a lot of Ts....
Junker I've only seen it called once (it was me) and heard of it called twice. The only reason I called it was that the kid stepped back inbounds after running the length of the baseline oob, caught the ball and made the shot. I couldn't get away with a violation (he was clearly back inbounds) so I had to go with the T. The coach understood after my explanation. Luckily it was in a weekend middle school tournament and not in a HS game. I still think it should be a T, not a violation.
Dan_ref Originally posted by Almost Always Right Originally posted by BktBallRef Originally posted by Back In The Saddle I hope they make the "playing oob" a violation instead of a technical foul. Say what? ^ What he said. He said "I...HOPE...THEY...MAKE...THE..."PLAYING OOB"...A...VIOLATION...INSTEAD...OF...A...TECHNICAL...FOUL"
FrankHtown Ok...where does 9-2-12 fit in? "No teammate of the thrower shall be out of bounds after a designated-spot throw-in begins" I interpret that to mean if a teammate of the thrower goes out of bounds, it's a throw-in violation. Is that the correct interpretation? Are we to call a violation or a technical?
BktBallRef Originally posted by FrankHtown Ok...where does 9-2-12 fit in? "No teammate of the thrower shall be out of bounds after a designated-spot throw-in begins" I interpret that to mean if a teammate of the thrower goes out of bounds, it's a throw-in violation. Is that the correct interpretation? Are we to call a violation or a technical? That's correct. It's a violation for a seconf player to be OOB when his team's thrower is already OOB with the ball.
brainbrian Originally posted by Snake~eyes I hope they make the "playing oob" a violation instead of a technical foul. I had a partner call it a violation, no one knew the difference. 😀 Then afterwards his teammate told him he couldn't do that. They player said "I know." I would prefer the violation better.
refnrev He said "I...HOPE...THEY...MAKE...THE..."PLAYING OOB"...A...VIOLATION...INSTEAD...OF...A...TECHNICAL...FOUL" [/B][/QUOTE] ___________________________________________________________ OK Dan.. I know you said it louder. Now can you say it a little slower.
refnrev Originally posted by Junker I've only seen it called once (it was me) and heard of it called twice. The only reason I called it was that the kid stepped back inbounds after running the length of the baseline oob, caught the ball and made the shot. I couldn't get away with a violation (he was clearly back inbounds) so I had to go with the T. The coach understood after my explanation. Luckily it was in a weekend middle school tournament and not in a HS game. I still think it should be a T, not a violation. ___________________________________________________________ I've seen it called once and it was a bad call, in fact the call was ridiculous. It didn't even fit the situation it is designed to prevent. It was a bad T and I ended up having to have a fan ejected because he wouldn't get off my partner's back. I hope they change this to a violation.
Snake~eyes Originally posted by brainbrian Originally posted by Snake~eyes I hope they make the "playing oob" a violation instead of a technical foul. I had a partner call it a violation, no one knew the difference. 😀 Then afterwards his teammate told him he couldn't do that. They player said "I know." I would prefer the violation better. LOL, You quoted it wrong! 😀 I didn't say that!
brandan89 I hear their wanting to change the uniform..... Striped shirt, instead of black pants, going with the fishnets. 🙂 [Edited by brandan89 on Apr 9th, 2005 at 07:31 PM]
Mark Padgett Originally posted by brandan89 I hear their wanting to change the uniform..... Striped shirt, instad of black pants, going with the fishnets. 🙂 You mean without shorts!?!?!? 🙄
refnrev Originally posted by Mark Padgett Originally posted by brandan89 I hear their wanting to change the uniform..... Striped shirt, instad of black pants, going with the fishnets. 🙂 You mean without shorts!?!?!? 🙄 ___________________________________________________________ Padgett, You scare me some days, man -- you really do! (LOL) RR