The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 15, 2005, 12:53am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,463
I just want to make sure I understand this right.

I have not done a college game in a few weeks and never had this happen in my game, but want to make sure I have an understanding of the college technical foul procedure. I also do not have my rulebook in front of me.

An AF player was on a fast break all alone and dunks the ball. A New Mexico player was behind the AF player and after the dunk and the AF player came completely to the floor, the NM player shoved the AF player completely into the stands. The officials called a technical foul properly. They had AF shoot two FTs and gave them the ball at the division line. Now was this right? I do not know if they ejected the NM player. Why did they not go to POI? Should they have gone to POI?

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 15, 2005, 01:12am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 10
Didn't see the game, but it sounds like the call was an intentional technical foul. Rule 10, Section 15, Art 1 on page 147. Directly following that is the penalty in Section 16, Art 1 - which is 2 shots and the ball at the division line.
__________________
Keepin' cool in the north.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 15, 2005, 01:13am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,994
Rut,
I saw the play too. They did it perfectly. This was an technical foul against the New Mexico player for intentional contact during a dead ball. The NCAA penalty for that is two shots plus possession.

I'll get the clip from the NCAA book for you and post it.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 15, 2005, 01:14am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
There was a similiar play in a thread a week or so ago. This is an intentional technical foul. 2 shots and the ball at the division line. No POI.

10-15-1
An intentional technical foul involves intentionally contacting an opponent in a non-flagrant manner when the ball is dead.

10-16-1
The penalty for an intentional technical foul shall be two free throws awarded to a player of the offended team and possession of the ball to the offended team at a designated spot at the division line.

[Edited by BktBallRef on Feb 15th, 2005 at 01:16 AM]
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 15, 2005, 01:18am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,994
Thumbs up The officials nailed this one!

BR-147 RULE 10-13/FOULS AND PENALTIES

Section 15. (Men) Intentional Technical Fouls
Art. 1. An intentional technical foul involves intentionally contacting an
opponent in a non-flagrant manner when the ball is dead.
Section 16. (Men) Penalty for Intentional Technical Fouls
Art. 1. The penalty for an intentional technical foul shall be two free throws awarded to a player of the offended team and possession of the ball to the offended team at a designated spot at the division line.
Art. 2. The offender shall not be ejected.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 15, 2005, 01:19am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,994
You guys are so darn quick!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 15, 2005, 02:41am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,463
Thumbs up That was helpful.

That is what I thought, I just could not look it up to figure it out.

Thanks guys for your help.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 15, 2005, 06:20am
Huck Finn
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,347
Just a note without the rules citation. If the ball was picked up to be inbounded this would be handled differently. So the bottom line is there is a period of time after the ball goes through the hoop and before it is picked up for the throw-in where a technical foul is intentional.
__________________
"Be more concerned with your character than your reputation, because your character is what you really are, while your reputation is merely what others think you are." -- John Wooden
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 15, 2005, 09:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,016
Quote:
Originally posted by tomegun
Just a note without the rules citation. If the ball was picked up to be inbounded this would be handled differently. So the bottom line is there is a period of time after the ball goes through the hoop and before it is picked up for the throw-in where a technical foul is intentional.
After the ball was picked up, it wouldn't be a technical foul.

Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 15, 2005, 11:14am
Huck Finn
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,347
Quote:
Originally posted by bob jenkins
Quote:
Originally posted by tomegun
Just a note without the rules citation. If the ball was picked up to be inbounded this would be handled differently. So the bottom line is there is a period of time after the ball goes through the hoop and before it is picked up for the throw-in where a technical foul is intentional.
After the ball was picked up, it wouldn't be a technical foul.

Correct. It would just be intentional.
__________________
"Be more concerned with your character than your reputation, because your character is what you really are, while your reputation is merely what others think you are." -- John Wooden
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 15, 2005, 12:46pm
9 times
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: St. George, UT
Posts: 777
I just got off the phone with one of the officials on the game and verified that they called an intentional technical foul. That is why AF kept the ball and inbounded from mid court.
__________________
Get it right!

1999 (2x), 2006, 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016, 2019
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 15, 2005, 01:05pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,463
Quote:
Originally posted by stripes
I just got off the phone with one of the officials on the game and verified that they called an intentional technical foul. That is why AF kept the ball and inbounded from mid court.
That is what I thought, but it was not explained (surprise!!!) by the commentators very well. I knew the ball was dead. They have just changed this rule between the Men's and Women's game and I wanted to make sure I had the right rational. I have a college game this week and this could be an issue.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:02pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1