The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 11, 2005, 11:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 508
who is running down the floor behind and not directly in line with the dribbler, causing contact. Can anyone give me the reference for this in the NCAA Women's illustrated rules?

As I understand it, this is not specifically addressed in the high school case book, but the same reasoning that applies in the NCAA situation seems to fit. Don't go nuts, please. I already made the call . . .
__________________
Sarchasm: the gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the recipient.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 12, 2005, 03:31am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally posted by assignmentmaker
who is running down the floor behind and not directly in line with the dribbler, causing contact. Can anyone give me the reference for this in the NCAA Women's illustrated rules?

As I understand it, this is not specifically addressed in the high school case book, but the same reasoning that applies in the NCAA situation seems to fit. Don't go nuts, please. I already made the call . . .
Jeff, it is semi-covered in the NFHS case book. Try case book play 10.6.2SitB-COMMENT--"Screening principles apply to the dribbler who attempts to cut of an opponent who is approaching in a different path from the rear. In this case, the dribbler must allow such opponent a maximum of two steps or an opportunity to stop or avoid contact. When both the opponent and the dribbler are moving in exactly the same path and same direction, the player behind is responsible for contact which results if the player in front slows down or stops." The screening principles that they are talking about are found in rule 4-39-2&5.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 12, 2005, 03:44am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,674
If the dribbler bends over and sticks something out, usually it's a rear end or hip, the dribbler caused the contact.

Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 12, 2005, 08:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 508
The reference is . . .

http://www.ncaa.org/library/rules/20...lustrated'

A call whose time had come. There were bodies on the floor. I was gonna hafta call something . . .

The caption to the illustration in the NCAA book reads:

"Player Control foul by #4. Diagram 1 illustrates two players moving in parallel paths and in the same direction. Both players had their legal paths established. Diagram 2 shows #4 dribbling into the path of #5 without giving #5 sufficient time to stop or change direction."
__________________
Sarchasm: the gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the recipient.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 12, 2005, 08:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 508
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:
Originally posted by assignmentmaker
who is running down the floor behind and not directly in line with the dribbler, causing contact. Can anyone give me the reference for this in the NCAA Women's illustrated rules?

As I understand it, this is not specifically addressed in the high school case book, but the same reasoning that applies in the NCAA situation seems to fit. Don't go nuts, please. I already made the call . . .
Jeff, it is semi-covered in the NFHS case book. Try case book play 10.6.2SitB-COMMENT--"Screening principles apply to the dribbler who attempts to cut of an opponent who is approaching in a different path from the rear. In this case, the dribbler must allow such opponent a maximum of two steps or an opportunity to stop or avoid contact. When both the opponent and the dribbler are moving in exactly the same path and same direction, the player behind is responsible for contact which results if the player in front slows down or stops." The screening principles that they are talking about are found in rule 4-39-2&5.
I agree. This is proof by 'complement'. It sets up the principles, then says what the ruling is when it's not the case I'm talking about. Thanks.
__________________
Sarchasm: the gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the recipient.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:45pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1