substitutes

oldnewref · #1 (**permalink**) Fri Jan 28, 2005, 01:36pm

Player fouled, shooting 2 shots. Team A takes a time out. Players return to floor. No subs. Player shoots first FT. Then a sub is buzzed in. Player makes 2nd free throw, a second sub is buzzed in.

Question: Neither sub was available before the first horn. Obviously no time off the clock during the admin of freethrows. Should the subs have been allowed to enter?

Jurassic Referee · #2 (**permalink**) Fri Jan 28, 2005, 01:56pm

Quote:

Originally posted by oldnewref
Player fouled, shooting 2 shots. Team A takes a time out. Players return to floor. No subs. Player shoots first FT. Then a sub is buzzed in. Player makes 2nd free throw, a second sub is buzzed in.

Question: Neither sub was available before the first horn. Obviously no time off the clock during the admin of freethrows. Should the subs have been allowed to enter?

Yes, as per rule 3-3-1(c).

refnrev · #3 (**permalink**) Sat Jan 29, 2005, 01:14am

Yep!

rainmaker · #4 (**permalink**) Sat Jan 29, 2005, 01:18am

Quote:

Originally posted by refnrev
Yep!

If you keep posting like that, you'll catch up with mick and Jurassic real quick!

refnrev · #5 (**permalink**) Sat Jan 29, 2005, 01:27am

rainmaker,
I don't understand what that means?

Mark Dexter · #6 (**permalink**) Sat Jan 29, 2005, 08:33am

Quote:

Originally posted by rainmaker

Quote:

Originally posted by refnrev
Yep!

If you keep posting like that, you'll catch up with mick and Jurassic real quick!

Uh-huh.

rainmaker · #7 (**permalink**) Sat Jan 29, 2005, 09:45am

Quote:

Originally posted by refnrev
rainmaker,
I don't understand what that means?

Sometimes it looks as though people post things here just to get their "number of posts" score up. Things like "LOL", "you bet!" and so on. There's nothing wrong with that. I was just joshin' ya. (cute little smilie with a toothy grin)

refnrev · #8 (**permalink**) Sat Jan 29, 2005, 10:38am

OK. I need to plead ignorance here. Is there some reason one would want to get their number of posts up? I'm still new to this thing -- and really enjoy it. I thought maybe I inadvertently (I hate that word when I use it before the phrase "blew the whistle!) said or did something offensive and couldn't figure it out. Glad to know that wasn;t the case. I also don't know the people well enough to realize those things. Thanks for the heads up. But again, why would someone want their number of posts up?

eventnyc · #9 (**permalink**) Sat Jan 29, 2005, 11:12am

Quote:

Originally posted by refnrev
OK. I need to plead ignorance here. Is there some reason one would want to get their number of posts up? I'm still new to this thing -- and really enjoy it. I thought maybe I inadvertently (I hate that word when I use it before the phrase "blew the whistle!) said or did something offensive and couldn't figure it out. Glad to know that wasn;t the case. I also don't know the people well enough to realize those things. Thanks for the heads up. But again, why would someone want their number of posts up?

I don't know! 59, 60, 61 (wow). Just kidding!

Mark Dexter · #10 (**permalink**) Sat Jan 29, 2005, 01:48pm

Quote:

Originally posted by refnrev
OK. I need to plead ignorance here. Is there some reason one would want to get their number of posts up? I'm still new to this thing -- and really enjoy it. I thought maybe I inadvertently (I hate that word when I use it before the phrase "blew the whistle!) said or did something offensive and couldn't figure it out. Glad to know that wasn;t the case. I also don't know the people well enough to realize those things. Thanks for the heads up. But again, why would someone want their number of posts up?

Well, there used to be a list of the "top ten" prolific posters. That's been disabled, though, so it's just for show on each post now.