Which is worse, a coach who doesn't know the rules, or an assignor who does know the rules, but tells you to ignore the rules or to use his rules?
[Edited by SamIAm on Jan 25th, 2005 at 05:03 PM] |
Quote:
|
...An assignor, not the emotional coach.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Z |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Not a question, just some rambling thoughts.
My assignor is a gem. Never questioned any calls or at least I can't remember him doing so. I see posts like "you can't call it that way here" or "if you call that around here, you won't get any games". I also seem to recall a variation on the whether assignors are used or HS find there own officials. Pesonally, I can't think of anything closer to paying off an official than the schools finding their own officials. While there are the issues that can come up with assignors, it does separate the schools and the officials some. My thoughts are that the assignors are the bureacrats that can run or ruin the officiating civilization depending on whether they are on the dark side or not. Thanks for the posts. |
Neither are good! ;) But it's already been said it's a plus if the coach knows the rules. But an assignor would be worse.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
<font size = -2>Mr. Spelling Guy was away, but Mr. Grammar Guy is still checking in occasionally :)</font> |
I still say it depends on which rules we're talking about. Is the assignor saying to lay off of the bench techs for assistant coaches standing? Is the assignor saying to back off of the 10 second free throw count? Is the assignor saying to apply advantage/disadvantage to the 3 second count? Frankly, I need specifics before I can judge an assignor based on what SamIam posted.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:35pm. |