![]() |
Quote:
BTW, Syracuse just barely got by Rutgers. See the game? |
Quote:
Same answer as last week, mainly because the case book hasn't changed since then. No violation. Case book play 9.9.1SitC(b). |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You getting OK state at OU? 19-2, at the 12:40 mark |
Thanks. I agree.
"No violation. Case book play 9.9.1SitC(b)."
I think the rule is written badly and/or the situation is rather singular, using the issue of player location independently of ball location, which is not the case in other, allied rules. |
Quote:
You getting OK state at OU? 19-2, at the 12:40 mark [/B][/QUOTE]Yeah, blew an 18 point half-time lead. Lah me. Gonna head down in a minute or so to do some surfing, including OK/OU. I get the NCAA pass as well as getting all the Fox regionals on the dish too. Decisions...decisions :D |
Quote:
If you can get CCSU at Monmouth (NEC) check it out, Jackie Loube (IAABO head honcho) is working that game. |
Quote:
A1 is trapped on the sideline, in the FC. She leaps and attempts to throw the ball off B1. The ball goes off B1 but doesn't go OOB. Instead, it bounces toward the BC. A2 chases the ball, steps into the BC and grabs the ball while it was still in the FC. The ball was never in the BC, until A2 touches it? Violation? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Okay.
So how is this different than the original play? |
Quote:
I know I'm going to be sorry I posted this, I'm always wrong when I think too much. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
This play has the ball in team A's control IN the FC, touched by B, but the ball still has FC status until it touches A2 in the BC, VERY different than the case play. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:47am. |