Question 63 says: A substitute who legally enters the game during a dead ball period may not be withdrawn during that same dead ball period. Is this true or false?

False
 

The clock has to run before he can be taken out of the game.

Peace

I would say....
 

#63 is False. Refer to this thread http://www.officialforum.com/thread/15957

Re: False
 

Jeff -- you might want to edit that statement.

I think it should be false because rule 3-3.4 says a player that has been replaced or directed to leave shall not re-enter before the next opportunity after the clock has been started. It says nothing about a player that comes in having to stay in.

Thanks,
shon

if we are talking about maybe bringing in A6 to shoot a "t" for his/her team, then after the shots A7 can come in for them...yes because when you gave them the ball for the free throw then you had a live ball then a dead ball again...so you can sub...but this wouldn't be considered the same dead ball period even though the clock hasn't started yet would it???? but the player that A6 replaced can not come back in for him till the clock ticks..

J, live ball/dead ball is irrelevant to the question. There's no restriction on when a player may be subbed out. The restriction is on when a player may be subbed in. A player who subs out must wait a tick of the clock before coming back in.

your right.... :)
 

i guess i answered the wrong question....
so this is saying if we have a dead ball, A6 subs in for A1, then during the same dead ball period, the coach changes his mind and subs in A7 for A6?????? this could happen during a time out, what other situation could this possibly happen...

This would make #63 True.

A6 runs on the court, trips, starts bleeding.

#63 is false....
 

no rule that tells us it can't happen....so a sub can be subbed for during the same dead ball period.... it's just the person that went out that can't come back in till the clock ticks..